strict-election rule (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

strict-election rule in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
R.L.G. v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 1997 · cited in 5 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2017–2025
2 sentences

2025As this Court has explained: "Generally, Alabama follows a strict-election rule, by which the State must elect the offense on which it will proceed '[w]here the evidence discloses two or more offenses growing out of distinct and separate transactions.' R.L.G. v. State, 712 So. 2d 348, 355 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997), aff'd, 712 So. 2d 372 (Ala. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted).

2025As this Court has explained: "Generally, Alabama follows a strict-election rule, by which the State must elect the offense on which it will proceed '[w]here the evidence discloses two or more offenses growing out of distinct and separate transactions.' R.L.G. v. State, 712 So. 2d 348, 355 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997), aff'd, 712 So. 2d 372 (Ala. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted).

35

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
SHOULDIS v. State green
alacrimapp · 2008
2 sentences

2025Shouldis v. State, 38 So. 3d 753 , 761 n.4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008) (quoting 40 CR-2024-0086 and CR-2024-0157 "R.L.G., 712 So. 2d at 356 ).

2025Shouldis v. State, 38 So. 3d 753 , 761 n.4 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008) (quoting 40 CR-2024-0086 and CR-2024-0157 "R.L.G., 712 So. 2d at 356 ).

52017–2025

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AL § Ala. Code § 13A-5-6 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check