Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2018–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2019At the time of the offense on July 26, 1986, Segerstrom was fifteen-years old. 1 In Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 , 479, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court of the United States held that "the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders." The Court further held that defendants who committed homicide crimes as juveniles and faced a sentence of life without parole were entitled to a sentencing hearing that would permit a judge or jury to consider the individual characteristics of the defe 2019At the time of the offense on July 26, 1986, Segerstrom was fifteen-years old. 1 In Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 , 479, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court of the United States held that "the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders." The Court further held that defendants who committed homicide crimes as juveniles and faced a sentence of life without parole were entitled to a sentencing hearing that would permit a judge or jury to consider the individual characteristics of the defe | 5 | 2018–2019 |
Robinson v. State
green
2 sentences2019At the time of the offense on July 26, 1986, Segerstrom was fifteen-years old. 1 In Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 , 479, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court of the United States held that "the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders." The Court further held that defendants who committed homicide crimes as juveniles and faced a sentence of life without parole were entitled to a sentencing hearing that would permit a judge or jury to consider the individual characteristics of the defe 2019At the time of the offense on July 26, 1986, Segerstrom was fifteen-years old. 1 In Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 , 479, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court of the United States held that "the Eighth Amendment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without possibility of parole for juvenile offenders." The Court further held that defendants who committed homicide crimes as juveniles and faced a sentence of life without parole were entitled to a sentencing hearing that would permit a judge or jury to consider the individual characteristics of the defe | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Kelley v. Gordon
green
2 sentences2019Following Miller , and this court's opinions in Jackson v. Norris , 2013 Ark. 175 , 426 S.W.3d 906 and Kelley v. Gordon , 2015 Ark. 277 , 465 S.W.3d 842 , Segerstrom filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Hot Spring County Circuit Court on the ground that he was a juvenile when he committed the crime and was entitled to have his sentence vacated pursuant to Miller . 2019Following Miller , and this court's opinions in Jackson v. Norris , 2013 Ark. 175 , 426 S.W.3d 906 and Kelley v. Gordon , 2015 Ark. 277 , 465 S.W.3d 842 , Segerstrom filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Hot Spring County Circuit Court on the ground that he was a juvenile when he committed the crime and was entitled to have his sentence vacated pursuant to Miller . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Jackson v. Norris
green
2 sentences2019Following Miller , and this court's opinions in Jackson v. Norris , 2013 Ark. 175 , 426 S.W.3d 906 and Kelley v. Gordon , 2015 Ark. 277 , 465 S.W.3d 842 , Segerstrom filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Hot Spring County Circuit Court on the ground that he was a juvenile when he committed the crime and was entitled to have his sentence vacated pursuant to Miller . 2019Following Miller , and this court's opinions in Jackson v. Norris , 2013 Ark. 175 , 426 S.W.3d 906 and Kelley v. Gordon , 2015 Ark. 277 , 465 S.W.3d 842 , Segerstrom filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Hot Spring County Circuit Court on the ground that he was a juvenile when he committed the crime and was entitled to have his sentence vacated pursuant to Miller . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.