Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hurdgreen2 sentences1982State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 536-37 , 432 A.2d 86, 91-92 (1981) (citations omitted). [2] *198 The other cases in the "anti-hypnosis" line rely on other reasons for applying the Frye test. 1982State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525, 536-37 , 432 A.2d 86, 91-92 (1981) (citations omitted). [2] *198 The other cases in the "anti-hypnosis" line rely on other reasons for applying the Frye test. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. United States
red
2 sentences2014As a result of the amendment, Arizona abandoned the general-acceptance test set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. 2014Rule 702 and Daubert ¶ 17 Prior to 2010, Arizona’s standard for the admissibility of scientific expert testimony was the general acceptance test set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923). | 3 | 2013–2014 |
Logerquist v. McVey
green
2 sentences2013In doing so, the court departed from the general-acceptance test detailed in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and Logerquist v. McVey, 196 Ariz. 470 , 1 P.3d 113 (2000). ¶ 6 Rule 702, Fed.R.Evid., codifies the “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony that was announced in Daubert and clarified in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2 See Fed.R.Evid. 702 advisory comm, notes. 2013In doing so, the court departed from the general-acceptance test detailed in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and Logerquist v. McVey, 196 Ariz. 470 , 1 P.3d 113 (2000). ¶ 6 Rule 702, Fed.R.Evid., codifies the “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony that was announced in Daubert and clarified in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2 See Fed.R.Evid. 702 advisory comm, notes. | 2 | 2013–2014 |
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
green
2 sentences2013In doing so, the court departed from the general-acceptance test detailed in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and Logerquist v. McVey, 196 Ariz. 470 , 1 P.3d 113 (2000). ¶ 6 Rule 702, Fed.R.Evid., codifies the “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony that was announced in Daubert and clarified in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2 See Fed.R.Evid. 702 advisory comm, notes. 2013In doing so, the court departed from the general-acceptance test detailed in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and Logerquist v. McVey, 196 Ariz. 470 , 1 P.3d 113 (2000). ¶ 6 Rule 702, Fed.R.Evid., codifies the “reliability” test for the admissibility of expert testimony that was announced in Daubert and clarified in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 2 See Fed.R.Evid. 702 advisory comm, notes. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Id. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . 2001Id. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.