Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1985–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kinggreen2 sentences1996Murray, 184 Ariz. at 37-38 , 906 P.2d at 570-71 , citing State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or the helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). 1996Murray, 184 Ariz. at 37-38 , 906 P.2d at 570-71 , citing State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or the helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). | 3 | 3 |
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.green1 sentence1999See Cherne Industrial Inc. v. Grounds & Assoc., 278 N.W.2d 81, 90 (Minn.1979); Leistensnider, supra, at 275. | 1 | 1 |
Delaunay v. Union National Bankgreen1 sentence1996Murray, 184 Ariz. at 37-38 , 906 P.2d at 570-71 , citing State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or the helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Barreras
green
2 sentences1995Barreras, 181 Ariz. at 522 , 892 P.2d at 858 ; State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). 1995Barreras, 181 Ariz. at 522 , 892 P.2d at 858 ; State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). | 2 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Murray
green
2 sentences1996Murray, 184 Ariz. at 37-38 , 906 P.2d at 570-71 , citing State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or the helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). 1996Murray, 184 Ariz. at 37-38 , 906 P.2d at 570-71 , citing State v. King, 180 Ariz. 268, 287 , 883 P.2d 1024, 1043 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 215 , 133 L.Ed.2d 146 (1995) (“[0]nly under limited circumstances will the senselessness of a murder or the helplessness of the victim ... lead to [finding heinousness or depravity].”). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Gretzler
green
2 sentences1985Absent additional aggravation, however, neither of the last two factors alone will ordinarily be determinative on the question of heinousness or depravity. *504 Id. at 57 , 659 P.2d at 11 ; see Note, supra, at 678. 1985Absent additional aggravation, however, neither of the last two factors alone will ordinarily be determinative on the question of heinousness or depravity. *504 Id. at 57 , 659 P.2d at 11 ; see Note, supra, at 678. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.