Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 2018–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lujangreen1 sentence2025In our review, “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party requesting a jury instruction.” Id. at ¶ 2 (citation omitted). ¶23 “A defendant is entitled to an instruction on any theory of the case reasonably supported by the evidence.” State v. Richter, 245 Ariz. 1 , 6, ¶ 24 (2018) (quoting State v. Lujan, 136 Ariz. 102, 104 (1983)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hussaingreen1 sentence2021State v. Hussain, 189 Ariz. 336, 337 (App. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Cotterhill v. Bafilegreen1 sentence2020Cotterhill v. Bafile, 177 Ariz. 76, 79 (App. 1993). 2 IBARRA v. GASTELUM Opinion of the Court crack was unreasonably dangerous but denied ever seeing or hearing about the crack before Ibarra injured his toe. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel Almeida
green
2 sentences2023“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party requesting a jury instruction.” Id. at 108 ¶ 2. ¶6 Under A.R.S. § 13–404, “[a] person is justified in using physical force against another, and does not commit a crime, ‘when and to the extent a reasonable person would believe that physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful physical force.’” State v. Carson, 243 Ariz. 463 , 465 ¶ 9 (2018) (quoting A.R.S. § 13–404(A)). 2018State v. Almeida , 238 Ariz. 77 , ¶ 9, 356 P.3d 822 , 824-25 (App. 2015). | 2 | 2018–2023 |