Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjilgreen1 sentence2022Analyst’s analysis, p. 73; Richmond, at pp. 426-427; Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205, 217 (Bighorn); City of Palmdale v. Palmdale Water Dist. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 926, 934 ; Paland, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1371-1372.) Article XIII D section 6 imposes procedural and substantive limitations for imposing or increasing a property-related fee. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2002But while we appreciate the unique value and importance of education (see, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, 493 [ 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ] [“education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments”]), it is clear the intention of the voters was that Proposition 209 apply to education. 2002But while we appreciate the unique value and importance of education (see, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, 493 [ 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ] [“education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments”]), it is clear the intention of the voters was that Proposition 209 apply to education. | 1 | 1 |
Coalition For Economic Equity v. Pete Wilsongreen2 sentences2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy." ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 , 161 Cal. Rptr. 475 , 604 P.2d 1365 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate "set a different course" from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 , 99 S.Ct. 2721 , 61 L.Ed.2d 480 (cone. opn. of Blackmun, J.).) "Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender." ( Coalition for Economic Equity 2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy.” ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate “set a different course” from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 [ 99 S.Ct. 2721, 2733-2734 ] (conc. opn. of Black-mun, J.).) “Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender.” (Coalition for Economic Equality v. Wilson (9th Cir. 1997) 122 F.3d 692, | 1 | 1 |
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.green2 sentences2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy." ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 , 161 Cal. Rptr. 475 , 604 P.2d 1365 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate "set a different course" from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 , 99 S.Ct. 2721 , 61 L.Ed.2d 480 (cone. opn. of Blackmun, J.).) "Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender." ( Coalition for Economic Equity 2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy." ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 , 161 Cal. Rptr. 475 , 604 P.2d 1365 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate "set a different course" from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 , 99 S.Ct. 2721 , 61 L.Ed.2d 480 (cone. opn. of Blackmun, J.).) "Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender." ( Coalition for Economic Equity | 1 | 1 |
Price v. Civil Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr 2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr | 1 | 1 |
United Steelworkers of America v. Webergreen2 sentences2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr 2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.green2 sentences2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy." ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 , 161 Cal. Rptr. 475 , 604 P.2d 1365 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate "set a different course" from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 , 99 S.Ct. 2721 , 61 L.Ed.2d 480 (cone. opn. of Blackmun, J.).) "Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender." ( Coalition for Economic Equity 2000Moreover, preferences, for any purpose, are anathema to the very process of democracy." ( Price, supra, 26 Cal.3d 257, 299 , 161 Cal. Rptr. 475 , 604 P.2d 1365 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) By virtue of the initiative process, the California electorate "set a different course" from that charted by the courts since Weber and Price. ( Weber, supra, 443 U.S. 193, 216 , 99 S.Ct. 2721 , 61 L.Ed.2d 480 (cone. opn. of Blackmun, J.).) "Rather than classifying individuals by race or gender, Proposition 209 prohibits the State from classifying individuals by race or gender." ( Coalition for Economic Equity | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paland v. Brooktrails Township Community Services District Board of Directors
green
1 sentence2022Analyst’s analysis, p. 73; Richmond, at pp. 426-427; Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205, 217 (Bighorn); City of Palmdale v. Palmdale Water Dist. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 926, 934 ; Paland, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1371-1372.) Article XIII D section 6 imposes procedural and substantive limitations for imposing or increasing a property-related fee. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
City of Palmdale v. Palmdale Water District
green
1 sentence2022Analyst’s analysis, p. 73; Richmond, at pp. 426-427; Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205, 217 (Bighorn); City of Palmdale v. Palmdale Water Dist. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 926, 934 ; Paland, supra, 179 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1371-1372.) Article XIII D section 6 imposes procedural and substantive limitations for imposing or increasing a property-related fee. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hunter v. Erickson
green
2 sentences2010J.).) Finally, affirmative action is a racial issue in the same way that the fair housing ordinance in Hunter and the desegregative busing in Seattle were racial issues. ( Seattle, supra, 458 U.S. at pp. 471-472; Hunter, supra, 393 U.S. at p. 391 .) That is, "although [section 31] on its face treats [Whites and racial minorities, men and women] in an identical manner, the reality is that the law's impact falls on the minority." ( Hunter, at p. 391.) Affirmative action "inures primarily to the benefit of the minority, and is designed for that purpose." ( Seattle, at p. 472.) And while racial mi 2010J.).) Finally, affirmative action is a racial issue in the same way that the fair housing ordinance in Hunter and the desegregative busing in Seattle were racial issues. ( Seattle, supra, 458 U.S. at pp. 471-472; Hunter, supra, 393 U.S. at p. 391 .) That is, "although [section 31] on its face treats [Whites and racial minorities, men and women] in an identical manner, the reality is that the law's impact falls on the minority." ( Hunter, at p. 391.) Affirmative action "inures primarily to the benefit of the minority, and is designed for that purpose." ( Seattle, at p. 472.) And while racial mi | 1 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Edelbacher
green
2 sentences2003Analyst's analysis of Prop. 18, Mar. 7, 2000 Ballot Pamphlet.) The analysis further stated: "This measure amends state law so that a case of first degree murder is eligible for a finding of a special circumstance if the murderer intentionally killed the victim 'by means of lying in wait.' In so doing, this measure replaces the current language establishing a special circumstance for murders committed `while lying in wait.' This change would permit the finding of a special circumstance not only in a case in which a murder occurred immediately upon a confrontation between the murderer and the vi 2003Analyst's analysis of Prop. 18, Mar. 7, 2000 Ballot Pamphlet.) The analysis further stated: "This measure amends state law so that a case of first degree murder is eligible for a finding of a special circumstance if the murderer intentionally killed the victim 'by means of lying in wait.' In so doing, this measure replaces the current language establishing a special circumstance for murders committed `while lying in wait.' This change would permit the finding of a special circumstance not only in a case in which a murder occurred immediately upon a confrontation between the murderer and the vi | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Morales
green
2 sentences2003Analyst's analysis of Prop. 18, Mar. 7, 2000 Ballot Pamphlet.) The analysis further stated: "This measure amends state law so that a case of first degree murder is eligible for a finding of a special circumstance if the murderer intentionally killed the victim 'by means of lying in wait.' In so doing, this measure replaces the current language establishing a special circumstance for murders committed `while lying in wait.' This change would permit the finding of a special circumstance not only in a case in which a murder occurred immediately upon a confrontation between the murderer and the vi 2003Analyst's analysis of Prop. 18, Mar. 7, 2000 Ballot Pamphlet.) The analysis further stated: "This measure amends state law so that a case of first degree murder is eligible for a finding of a special circumstance if the murderer intentionally killed the victim 'by means of lying in wait.' In so doing, this measure replaces the current language establishing a special circumstance for murders committed `while lying in wait.' This change would permit the finding of a special circumstance not only in a case in which a murder occurred immediately upon a confrontation between the murderer and the vi | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Domino v. Superior Court
green
1 sentence2003Analyst's analysis of Prop. 18, Mar. 7, 2000 Ballot Pamphlet.) The analysis further stated: "This measure amends state law so that a case of first degree murder is eligible for a finding of a special circumstance if the murderer intentionally killed the victim 'by means of lying in wait.' In so doing, this measure replaces the current language establishing a special circumstance for murders committed `while lying in wait.' This change would permit the finding of a special circumstance not only in a case in which a murder occurred immediately upon a confrontation between the murderer and the vi | 1 | 2003–2003 |
DeRonde v. Regents of the University of California
green
2 sentences2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr 2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
green
2 sentences2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr 2000Analyst's analysis of Prop. 209, p. 30 ["[Current] law requires [state] departments ... to reject bids from companies that have not made sufficient `good faith efforts' to meet [`affirmative action' contracting] goals."].) As the district court in Coalition I, supra, 946 F.Supp. at page 1489, correctly perceived from these arguments, "the people of California meant to do something more than simply restate existing law when they adopted Proposition 209." In taking a measure of that "something more," the "historic Civil Rights Act" referent tells us the voters intended to reinstitute the interpr | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Lungren v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2000(Cf. Lungren, supra, 48 Cal. App.4th 435 , 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 690 .) Our holding is necessarily limited to the form at issue here, which requires prime contractors to notify, solicit, and negotiate with MBE/WBE subcontractors as well as justify rejection of their bids. 2000(Cf. Lungren, supra, 48 Cal. App.4th 435 , 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 690 .) Our holding is necessarily limited to the form at issue here, which requires prime contractors to notify, solicit, and negotiate with MBE/WBE subcontractors as well as justify rejection of their bids. | 1 | 2000–2000 |