Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 1918–1957 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fleharty v. Boltzengreen2 sentences1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ 1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ | 1 | 1 |
Rodabaugh v. Tekusgreen2 sentences1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ 1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dalley v. Williams
green
2 sentences1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ 1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ | 2 | 1955–1957 |
Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation
green
2 sentences1939We think, however, that this question is foreclosed in this state by the doctrine of the case of Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation, 33 Cal. App. 198 [ 164 Pac. 810 ]. 1939We think, however, that this question is foreclosed in this state by the doctrine of the case of Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation, 33 Cal. App. 198 [ 164 Pac. 810 ]. | 2 | 1918–1939 |
Doran v. City & County of San Francisco
green
1 sentence1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Bonebrake v. McCormick
green
2 sentences1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ 1957As was said in Dalley v. Williams, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d 427 . at page 435 [ 166 P.2d 595 ], ‘the term “place of safety” ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is *116 only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. ’ ” (Doran v. City & County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.2d at p. 489 .) Applicable here is the quotation from Rodabaugh v. Tekus, 39 Cal.2d 290, 295 [ 246 P.2d 663 ], appearing in Fleharty v. Boltzen, 137 Cal.App.2d 187, 191 [ 290 P.2d 311 ]: “ | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Schouten v. Crawford
green
2 sentences1956Then, and not until then, was the last clear chance doctrine applicable.’ “It has been likewise held that the term ‘place of safety’ ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. [Citing three cases.] While a person may be in danger or peril, i. e., while he may be simply exposed to injury, that is not enough to constitute a position of danger within the meaning of the last clear chance doctrine, and in order to com 1956Then, and not until then, was the last clear chance doctrine applicable.’ “It has been likewise held that the term ‘place of safety’ ordinarily includes the position of the plaintiff while he is merely approaching the place of danger, and so long as he is only approaching but is not actually in a position of danger, the plaintiff cannot invoke the doctrine. [Citing three cases.] While a person may be in danger or peril, i. e., while he may be simply exposed to injury, that is not enough to constitute a position of danger within the meaning of the last clear chance doctrine, and in order to com | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.