Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Riosgreen1 sentence2015(People v. Rios (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 542, 564 (Rios).) In the early morning hours of August 19, 2013, Lorelle Tapolski (Tapolski) was shuttling various people around in her Mitsubishi Diamante. | 1 | 1 |
Nazaroff v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. 1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. | 1 | 1 |
Vasquez v. Superior Courtred2 sentences1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. 1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. 1989(See Taylor v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 894 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 693 , 598 P.2d 854 ]; Vasquez v. Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 800, 807 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 484 P.2d 964 , 53 A.L.R.3d 513 ]; Nazaroff v. Superior Court (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 553, 557-558 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 657 ]; 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Extraordinary Writs, §§ 116, 118, pp. 751-755.) Procedural Background The defendants interposed a general demurrer as to the third cause of action on the ground that it did not constitute a valid action in battery and that it was barred by the statute of limitations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Foreman & Clark Corp. v. Fallon
green
1 sentence2026(Foreman & Clark Corp. v. Fallon (1971) 3 Cal.3d 875, 881 .) We do not find appellant’s opening brief so lacking as to warrant waiver. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
City of Eureka v. Superior Court of Humboldt County
green
1 sentence2024In an effort to overcome this omission, the dissent overlooks the issues that defendant in fact raises on appeal, which are—and we quote—that “[t]he court should have ordered the prosecution to obtain and disclose information sufficient for the defense to investigate whether psychiatric records existed and to subpoena them if they did” and that “[t]he trial court erred by not applying the Reber procedure of obtaining the records, balancing the need for disclosure against the privacy interest, determining which records were essential to protect Baugh’s confrontation right and making an adequate | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Moore
green
1 sentence2015(See People v. Moore (2006) 39 Cal.4th 168, 171 ; § 1538.5, subd. (i).) A. The report of a fight leading to the detention and arrest of Heinrichs On May 12, 2013, Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Gonzales2 was on patrol in Watsonville. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.