Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1919–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Boardgreen2 sentences1978App. Bd., supra, 4 Cal.3d 162 at p. 174 .) It is arithmetically possible that the sum of the factors’ separate ratings might ‘pyramid’ beyond 100 percent, which is obviously impermissible where they have been caused by one accident. 1976App. Bd., supra, 4 Cal.3d 162 at p. 174.) It is arithmetically possible that the sum of the factors’ separate ratings might “pyramid” beyond 100 percent, which is obviously impermissible where they have been caused by one accident. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tracy Press, Inc. v. Superior Court
green
1 sentence2015(See Tracy Press, Inc. v. Superior Court (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1290, 1302 .) The sum of these factors strongly supports the trial court’s conclusion that the tenants were indispensible to the present action. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Tulare County Power Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.
green
1 sentence1970The indemnitee may, without having paid anything, recover from the indemnitor as soon as liability is legally imposed. [Citations.]” (88 Cal.App.2d at pp. 898-900.) 8 In Tulare County Power Co. v. Pacific Surety Co., supra, the court stated, “The sum of the rule as to interest in such cases is this: That an assured who pays a judgment for the full amount limited in a liability policy indemnifying against actual loss, or a judgment for a smaller amount than such limited sum, can recover the sum with interest only from the time of such payment, but that interest accruing on the judgment pending | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Stephens v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.
neutral
1 sentence1919Cas. 478, 97 N. W. 686 ].) [9] The sum of the rule as to interest in such eases is this: That an assured who pays a judgment for the full, amount limited in a liability policy indemnifying against actual loss, or a judgment for a smaller amount than such limited sum, can recover the sum with interest only from the time of such payment, but that interest accruing on the ¡judgment pending an appeal therefrom is not an expense of defending' the action. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.