accompanying analysis (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

accompanying analysis in Colorado

5 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Lapponese v. Carts of Colorado, Inc.green
moctapp · 2013 · cited in 3 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015This is especially so because the prior division's analysis is limited. , See People in the Interest of A.R., 2012 COA 195M , 1 24, 810 P.3d 1007 (deelining to follow another division where the holding was "without an accompanying analysis"); see also Lapponese v. Carts of Colo., Inc., 422 S.W.3d 396, 403 (Mo.Ct.App.2013) ("We are not persuaded by the limited analysis of the Missouri sales commission statutes by the Eighth Circuit, and decline to follow its interpretation of Section 407.918."). d.

2015See People in the Interest of A.R. , 2012 COA 195M , ¶24 (declining to follow another division where the holding was “without an accompanying analysis”); see also Lapponese v. Carts of Colo., Inc. , 422 S.W.3d 396, 403 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013) (“We are not persuaded by the limited analysis of the Missouri sales commission statutes by the Eighth Circuit, and decline to follow its interpretation of Section 407.913.”). d.

33
v. Peoplegreen
colo · 2020 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025Id. ¶ 19 “Whether sufficient evidence exists to support the requested instruction is a question of law that we review de novo.” Castillo, ¶ 32. 3.

2025Galvan v. People, 2020 CO 82, ¶ 24 (citations omitted). 9 Accordingly, a court should decline to instruct on an affirmative defense or an accompanying exception only when there is no evidence in the record to support it.

11
People Ex Rel. Kdgreen
coloctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Reasonable Efforts 1 24 Another division of this court, in People in Interest of KD., 155 P.3d 634, 637 (Colo.App.2007), held, without an accompanying analysis, that the "active efforts" standard is equivalent to the "reasonable efforts" standard applied in non-ICWA cases.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-4-102 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-301 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-307 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-401 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-34-405 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-4-105 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-4-106 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-103 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-112.5 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-125.3 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-125.4 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-125.5 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 28 (1970–2026) CA 19 (1963–2026) OH 12 (1999–2025) LA 8 (1957–2021) NY 7 (1969–2015) MA 7 (1985–2025) IL 5 (1976–2007) CO 5 (2012–2025) OK 5 (1910–1974) CT 5 (1945–2009) FL 4 (1982–2013) WA 4 (1977–2001) IN 3 (1979–2014) NM 3 (1960–2025) VA 3 (1995–2018) NC 3 (2017–2026) KS 3 (2004–2015) OR 3 (1985–2020) AK 3 (1995–2021) PA 3 (1996–2025) MO 3 (1959–2024) HI 3 (2007–2017) DC 3 (1976–1995) UT 2 (1992–2022) VT 2 (2003–2020) AZ 2 (1989–2026) WV 2 (1909–1980) SD 2 (2007–2011) NJ 2 (1979–1979) MD 2 (1980–2000) IA 2 (2003–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check