Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1907–1961 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Climax Molybdenum Company v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1961The questions involved have been disposed of adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error by our recent decision in Climax Molybdenum Company v. Ind. Comm., et al., 146 Colo. 558 , 362 P. (2d) 565 . 1961The questions involved have been disposed of adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error by our recent decision in Climax Molybdenum Company v. Ind. Comm., et al., 146 Colo. 558 , 362 P. (2d) 565 . | 2 | 1961–1961 |
People ex rel. Green v. Court of Appeals
neutral
2 sentences1914Green v. Court of Appeals, 27 Colo. 405 , 61 Pac. 592 , 51 L. 1914Green v. Court of Appeals, 27 Colo. 405 , 61 Pac. 592 , 51 L. | 2 | 1914–1914 |
McKercher v. Green
green
2 sentences1914It is true that' the special chapter relative to habeas corpus makes no- provision for appeal to the District Court from a judgment or order of the County Court, but the same is true as to the right of appeal fro-m or writ' of error to the District Court; so that if the provisions of that chapter are controlling upon the right of appeal or to writ of error, they are as conclusive against that right as to judgments of the District Court as to those of the County Court; and that question, so far as it pertains to- appeals from the District Court, has- been determined adversely to the contention 1914It is true that' the special chapter relative to habeas corpus makes no- provision for appeal to the District Court from a judgment or order of the County Court, but the same is true as to the right of appeal fro-m or writ' of error to the District Court; so that if the provisions of that chapter are controlling upon the right of appeal or to writ of error, they are as conclusive against that right as to judgments of the District Court as to those of the County Court; and that question, so far as it pertains to- appeals from the District Court, has- been determined adversely to the contention | 2 | 1914–1914 |
Melville v. Weybrew
green
1 sentence1941These questions were resolved adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error in Melville v. Weybrew, 106 Colo. 121 , supra, wherein we upheld the judgment initially appointing the present receiver. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Danielson v. Industrial Commission
neutral
2 sentences1939Danielson v. Industrial Com., 96 Colo. 522 , 44 P. (2d) 1011 . 1939Danielson v. Industrial Com., 96 Colo. 522 , 44 P. (2d) 1011 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Ladd v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1912In Ladd v. Johnson, 32 Ore. 195 , the .instrument creating the trust expressly stated that the conveyance was not intended for a mortgage, but a/ trust, and that it was made with the express desire to avoid proceedings - by foreclosure. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Brown v. State
neutral
1 sentence1907There are many authorities which warrant the plaintiffs in error in making this contention, among which are: — Gladden v. State, 13 Fla. 623 ; State v. Brooks, 9 Ala. 9 ; Keitler v. State, 4 Iowa 291 ; Brown v. State, 9 Neb. 157 ; Stokes v. State, 24 Miss. 621 . ' Upon the other hand, however, there is very respectable authority for the rule that the statute is simply directory, and is not exclusive of the common-law method of securing juries. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Gladden v. State
green
1 sentence1907There are many authorities which warrant the plaintiffs in error in making this contention, among which are: — Gladden v. State, 13 Fla. 623 ; State v. Brooks, 9 Ala. 9 ; Keitler v. State, 4 Iowa 291 ; Brown v. State, 9 Neb. 157 ; Stokes v. State, 24 Miss. 621 . ' Upon the other hand, however, there is very respectable authority for the rule that the statute is simply directory, and is not exclusive of the common-law method of securing juries. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Stokes & Johnson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1907There are many authorities which warrant the plaintiffs in error in making this contention, among which are: — Gladden v. State, 13 Fla. 623 ; State v. Brooks, 9 Ala. 9 ; Keitler v. State, 4 Iowa 291 ; Brown v. State, 9 Neb. 157 ; Stokes v. State, 24 Miss. 621 . ' Upon the other hand, however, there is very respectable authority for the rule that the statute is simply directory, and is not exclusive of the common-law method of securing juries. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
State v. Brooks
neutral
1 sentence1907There are many authorities which warrant the plaintiffs in error in making this contention, among which are: — Gladden v. State, 13 Fla. 623 ; State v. Brooks, 9 Ala. 9 ; Keitler v. State, 4 Iowa 291 ; Brown v. State, 9 Neb. 157 ; Stokes v. State, 24 Miss. 621 . ' Upon the other hand, however, there is very respectable authority for the rule that the statute is simply directory, and is not exclusive of the common-law method of securing juries. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.