Government proves violation (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

Government proves violation in Colorado

5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.green
scotus · 1961 · cited in 5 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1993–2016
2 sentences

2016Colo. Springs Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. State , 780 P.2d 494, 498 (Colo. 1989); see also United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 366 U.S. 316, 323 (1961) (“[T]he suit has been a futile exercise if the Government proves a violation but fails to secure a remedy adequate to redress it.”).

2016Colo. Springs Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. State, 780 P.2d 494, 498 (Colo.1989); see also United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 366 U.S. 316, 323 , 81 S.Ct. 1243 , 6 L.Ed.2d 318 (1961) (“[T]he suit has been a futile exercise if the Government proves a violation but fails to secure a remedy adequate to redress it.”).

45
Colorado Springs Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Stategreen
colo · 1989 · cited in 4 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016
2 sentences

2016Colo. Springs Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. State , 780 P.2d 494, 498 (Colo. 1989); see also United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 366 U.S. 316, 323 (1961) (“[T]he suit has been a futile exercise if the Government proves a violation but fails to secure a remedy adequate to redress it.”).

2016Colo. Springs Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. State, 780 P.2d 494, 498 (Colo.1989); see also United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 366 U.S. 316, 323 , 81 S.Ct. 1243 , 6 L.Ed.2d 318 (1961) (“[T]he suit has been a futile exercise if the Government proves a violation but fails to secure a remedy adequate to redress it.”).

34

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

CO 5 (1993–2016) VA 2 (1988–1991) WA 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check