legal or equitable claim (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

legal or equitable claim in Colorado

5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Johnson v. Dunkel green
colo · 1955
2 sentences

2003See § 5734 (property may be redeemed by the owner or “any person having a legal or equitable claim therein ... at any time before the execution of the treasurer’s deed”); First Nat’l Bank v. Fitzpatrick, 624 P.2d 927 (Colo.App.1981)(party that acquired title by adverse possession may redeem prior to the issuance of a treasurer’s deed); cf. Johnson v. Dunkel, 132 Colo. 383 , 288 P.2d 343 (1955)(no right to redeem when party did not acquire title by adverse possession).

2003See § 5734 (property may be redeemed by the owner or “any person having a legal or equitable claim therein ... at any time before the execution of the treasurer’s deed”); First Nat’l Bank v. Fitzpatrick, 624 P.2d 927 (Colo.App.1981)(party that acquired title by adverse possession may redeem prior to the issuance of a treasurer’s deed); cf. Johnson v. Dunkel, 132 Colo. 383 , 288 P.2d 343 (1955)(no right to redeem when party did not acquire title by adverse possession).

12003–2003
FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Fitzpatrick green
coloctapp · 1981
1 sentence

2003See § 5734 (property may be redeemed by the owner or “any person having a legal or equitable claim therein ... at any time before the execution of the treasurer’s deed”); First Nat’l Bank v. Fitzpatrick, 624 P.2d 927 (Colo.App.1981)(party that acquired title by adverse possession may redeem prior to the issuance of a treasurer’s deed); cf. Johnson v. Dunkel, 132 Colo. 383 , 288 P.2d 343 (1955)(no right to redeem when party did not acquire title by adverse possession).

12003–2003
Swofford v. Colorado National Bank of Denver green
coloctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1996Swofford v. Colorado National Bank, 628 P.2d 184 (Colo.App.1981).

11996–1996
Notch Mountain Corp. v. Elliott green
colo · 1995
1 sentence

1996In construing the right to redeem, we have explained that “the right of redemption is statutory and can be exercised only according to statutory prescriptions.” See, e.g., Notch Mountain, 898 P.2d at 555 .

11996–1996
Boyle v. Culp green
colo · 1966
2 sentences

1981See § 39-12-103(1), C.R.S.1973; Boyle v. Culp, 159 Colo. 423 , 412 P.2d 543 (1966).

1981See § 39-12-103(1), C.R.S.1973; Boyle v. Culp, 159 Colo. 423 , 412 P.2d 543 (1966).

11981–1981
Ruth v. Devany green
colo · 1928
2 sentences

1966Because the defendant Reid was allowed to effect his redemption, presumptively, he had the requisite interest in the property; and the burden was upon the plaintiffs, in the first instance, to offer evidence rebutting the presumption. * * *” (Emphasis supplied.) C.R.S. ’53, 137-11-3, which was in effect at the time of the redemption by Mrs. Culp, provides that: “Real property sold for taxes may be redeemed by the owner, his agent, assignee, or his attorney; by any person having a legal or equitable claim therein; * * *” In Ruth v. Devany, 84 Colo. 476 , 271 Pac. 623 , this court held that C.L.

1966Because the defendant Reid was allowed to effect his redemption, presumptively, he had the requisite interest in the property; and the burden was upon the plaintiffs, in the first instance, to offer evidence rebutting the presumption. * * *” (Emphasis supplied.) C.R.S. ’53, 137-11-3, which was in effect at the time of the redemption by Mrs. Culp, provides that: “Real property sold for taxes may be redeemed by the owner, his agent, assignee, or his attorney; by any person having a legal or equitable claim therein; * * *” In Ruth v. Devany, 84 Colo. 476 , 271 Pac. 623 , this court held that C.L.

11966–1966
Bean v. Westwood green
colo · 1937
2 sentences

1966Bean v. Westwood, 101 Colo. 288 , 73 P.2d 386 , was a case very similar to the case at bar.

1966Bean v. Westwood, 101 Colo. 288 , 73 P.2d 386 , was a case very similar to the case at bar.

11966–1966

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 39-12-103 (4) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 39-11-120 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 39-11-128 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 38 (1863–2025) CA 13 (2017–2025) AR 9 (1898–2013) WA 9 (1910–2024) AZ 8 (1888–2024) MI 6 (1933–2023) MN 5 (1911–2008) CO 5 (1966–2003) TX 5 (1915–2020) NE 3 (1894–1902) IL 3 (1906–1930) OH 3 (1870–2026) MD 2 (1973–2004) MS 2 (2009–2010) OK 2 (2017–2017) MO 2 (1882–1902) OR 2 (1898–1919) IN 2 (1891–1900) DE 2 (1919–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check