5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Creech v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV., MOTOR VEHICLE DIV.green2 sentences1985See Creech v. Department of Revenue, 190 Colo. 174 , 544 P.2d 633 (1976); State v. Keller, 36 Wash.App. 110 , 672 P.2d 412 (1983). 1985See Creech v. Department of Revenue, 190 Colo. 174 , 544 P.2d 633 (1976); State v. Keller, 36 Wash.App. 110 , 672 P.2d 412 (1983). | 2 | 2 |
Speiser v. Randallgreen2 sentences1990As we said in Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 525-26 [ 78 S.Ct. 1332, 1341-42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1460 ] (1958): “There is always in litigation a margin of error, representing error in factfinding, which both parties must take into account. 1990As we said in Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 525-26 [ 78 S.Ct. 1332, 1341-42 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1460 ] (1958): “There is always in litigation a margin of error, representing error in factfinding, which both parties must take into account. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Keller
green
2 sentences1985See Creech v. Department of Revenue, 190 Colo. 174 , 544 P.2d 633 (1976); State v. Keller, 36 Wash.App. 110 , 672 P.2d 412 (1983). 1985See Creech v. Department of Revenue, 190 Colo. 174 , 544 P.2d 633 (1976); State v. Keller, 36 Wash.App. 110 , 672 P.2d 412 (1983). | 2 | 1985–1985 |
Wiesner v. Huber
green
2 sentences2010In addition, the division said the "presumption of accuracy is likely intended as a margin of error for the BAC requiring revocation." Id. at 976 . 2010It reasoned the "0.096 BAC presumption of accuracy is a reasonable margin of error for the 0.08 BAC revocation finding," but "because 0.096 is considerably lower than 0. 17, the presumption of accuracy does not represent a margin of error for the 'persistent drunk driver' finding." Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Alderman v. United States
green
2 sentences1982Unavoidably, this is a matter of judgment, but in our view the task is too complex, and the margin for error too great, to rely wholly on the in camera judgment of the trial court to identify those records which might have contributed to the Government's case." 394 U.S. at 182 , 89 S.Ct. at 971 , 22 L.Ed.2d at 192 . 1982Unavoidably, this is a matter of judgment, but in our view the task is too complex, and the margin for error too great, to rely wholly on the in camera judgment of the trial court to identify those records which might have contributed to the Government's case." 394 U.S. at 182 , 89 S.Ct. at 971 , 22 L.Ed.2d at 192 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.