Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Freemangreen2 sentences2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. 2015“The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.” People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40 However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction.’” People v. Miller , 113 P.3d 743, 750 (Colo. 2005) (quoting People v. Gar | 3 | 4 |
People v. Millergreen2 sentences2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. 2015“The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.” People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40 However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction.’” People v. Miller , 113 P.3d 743, 750 (Colo. 2005) (quoting People v. Gar | 3 | 3 |
People v. Stanleygreen2 sentences2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. 2015“The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.” People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40 However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction.’” People v. Miller , 113 P.3d 743, 750 (Colo. 2005) (quoting People v. Gar | 2 | 2 |
People v. Garciagreen2 sentences2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. 2015“The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.” People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40 However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction.’” People v. Miller , 113 P.3d 743, 750 (Colo. 2005) (quoting People v. Gar | 2 | 2 |
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co.green2 sentences2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. 2015Co. , 194 Colo. 107, 110 , 570 P.2d 239, 241 (1977). “The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error.†People v. Stanley , 170 P.3d 782, 792 (Colo. App. 2007) (quoting People v. Freeman , 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo. 1983)). ¶40       However, “the defendant must ‘demonstrate not only that the instruction affected a substantial right, but also that the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the [plain] error contributed to his conviction. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Montoyagreen2 sentences2007"The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error." People v. Freeman, 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo.1983); see also People v. Montoya, 141 P.3d 916, 920 (Colo.App. 2006). 2007"The trial court has the duty to instruct the jury properly on all matters of law, and the failure to do so with respect to the essential elements of the offense constitutes plain error." People v. Freeman, 668 P.2d 1371, 1382 (Colo.1983); see also People v. Montoya, 141 P.3d 916, 920 (Colo.App. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Archuleta
green
2 sentences1983People v. Hardin, supra; *1383 People v. Archuleta, 180 Colo. 156 , 503 P.2d 346 (1972). 1983People v. Hardin, supra; *1383 People v. Archuleta, 180 Colo. 156 , 503 P.2d 346 (1972). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.