majority relies principle (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

majority relies principle in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Maryland v. King green
scotus · 2013
1 sentence

2025C Rather than look to Connecticut’s own statutes and case law, which, in my view, support the conclusion that an individual in the defendant’s position has a rea- sonable expectation of privacy in the extraction and testing of his shed DNA for identification purposes under article first, § 7, the majority relies on its analysis of Maryland v. King, supra, 569 U.S. 435 , to conclude that federal precedent gives us ‘‘a reasonable degree of certainty how the United States Supreme Court would resolve the issue’’ under the fourth amendment, namely, that the defendant has no expectation of privacy i

12025–2025
Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. Morin green
connappct · 2010
2 sentences

2019Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. Morin , 125 Conn. App. 165 , 167, 7 A.3d 919 (2010).

2019Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. Morin , 125 Conn. App. 165 , 167, 7 A.3d 919 (2010).

12019–2019
Pisel v. Stamford Hospital green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

2015The majority relies on the principle that ‘‘[s]o long as harm of the general nature as that which occurred is foreseeable there is a basis for liability even though the manner in which the accident happens is unusual, bizarre or unforeseeable.’’ Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, 180 Conn. 314, 333 , 430 A.2d 1 (1980).

2015The majority relies on the principle that ‘‘[s]o long as harm of the general nature as that which occurred is foreseeable there is a basis for liability even though the manner in which the accident happens is unusual, bizarre or unforeseeable.’’ Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, 180 Conn. 314, 333 , 430 A.2d 1 (1980).

12015–2015
Charles v. Charles green
conn · 1997
2 sentences

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S. Ct. 1838 , 140 L.

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S. Ct. 1838 , 140 L.

12009–2009
In re Turner green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S. Ct. 1838 , 140 L.

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S.Ct. 1838 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1998).

12009–2009
Hoffman v. Hunt green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S. Ct. 1838 , 140 L.

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S.Ct. 1838 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1998).

12009–2009
United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Performance Friction Corp. green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S. Ct. 1838 , 140 L.

2009Charles v. Charles, 243 Conn. 255, 262 , 701 A.2d 650 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1136 , 118 S.Ct. 1838 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1089 (1998).

12009–2009
McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. Berman green
conn · 1991
2 sentences

2003Finally, this brings me to the only case on which the majority relies for its analysis, namely, McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. Berman, 218 Conn. 512 , 590 A.2d 438 (1991). 11 In my view, that case offers no support for the majority’s analysis, despite the majority’s assertion to the contrary.

2003Finally, this brings me to the only case on which the majority relies for its analysis, namely, McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. Berman, 218 Conn. 512 , 590 A.2d 438 (1991). 11 In my view, that case offers no support for the majority’s analysis, despite the majority’s assertion to the contrary.

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

TX 6 (1973–2012) IL 6 (1987–2020) PA 5 (1966–2019) CT 5 (2003–2025) AL 3 (2008–2009) CO 3 (1982–2020) AR 3 (2003–2016) CA 3 (2001–2016) MN 3 (1994–2010) LA 2 (2006–2025) MI 2 (1997–2022) GA 2 (1997–2005) NY 2 (1997–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check