plaintiffs notice claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

plaintiffs notice claim in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Discuillo v. Stone & Webstergreen
conn · 1997 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See Discuillo v. Stone & Webster, 242 Conn. 570, 577 , 698 A.2d 873 (1997) (filing timely notice of claim condition precedent to liability and jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived).

2009See Discuillo v. Stone & Webster, 242 Conn. 570, 577 , 698 A.2d 873 (1997) (filing timely notice of claim condition precedent to liability and jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Bresnan v. Frankel green
conn · 1992
2 sentences

2002“It is well established law that the state is immune from suit unless it consents to be sued by appropriate legislation waiving sovereign immunity in certain prescribed cases . . . .” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bresnan v. Frankel, 224 Conn. 23, 25-26 , 615 A.2d 1040 (1992).

2002“It is well established law that the state is immune from suit unless it consents to be sued by appropriate legislation waiving sovereign immunity in certain prescribed cases . . . .” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bresnan v. Frankel, 224 Conn. 23, 25-26 , 615 A.2d 1040 (1992).

12002–2002
Shay v. Rossi green
conn · 2000
2 sentences

2002Excerpts of the two depositions as well as xerographic copies of two photographs of the scene were included with the motion. 5 On January 25, 2001, the court denied the motion to dismiss, concluding that “the description in the plaintiffs notice of claim was sufficiently detailed to provide the [commissioner] with enough information to investigate the plaintiffs claim.” On February 13, 2001, the commissioner, pursuant to the rule of Shay v. Rossi, 253 Conn. 134, 167 , 749 A.2d 1147 (2000) (en banc), appealed from the denial of his motion. 6 We now set forth the legal principles that guide our

2002Excerpts of the two depositions as well as xerographic copies of two photographs of the scene were included with the motion. 5 On January 25, 2001, the court denied the motion to dismiss, concluding that “the description in the plaintiffs notice of claim was sufficiently detailed to provide the [commissioner] with enough information to investigate the plaintiffs claim.” On February 13, 2001, the commissioner, pursuant to the rule of Shay v. Rossi, 253 Conn. 134, 167 , 749 A.2d 1147 (2000) (en banc), appealed from the denial of his motion. 6 We now set forth the legal principles that guide our

12002–2002
Paul Revere Life Insurance v. Pastena green
conn · 1999
1 sentence

2000We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification limited to the following two issues: (1) “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs notice of claim was insufficient to support a motion to preclude?”; and (2) “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his injury was caused by repetitive trauma/activity that arose out of and during the course of employment?” Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc., 248 Conn. 918, 918-19 , 734 A.2d 567 (1999).

12000–2000
State v. Forde green
conn · 1999
1 sentence

2000We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification limited to the following two issues: (1) “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs notice of claim was insufficient to support a motion to preclude?”; and (2) “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his injury was caused by repetitive trauma/activity that arose out of and during the course of employment?” Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc., 248 Conn. 918, 918-19 , 734 A.2d 567 (1999).

12000–2000
Borent v. State green
connappct · 1994
2 sentences

1999Borent v. State, 33 Conn. App. 495, 499 , 636 A.2d 392 (1994).

1999Borent v. State, 33 Conn. App. 495, 499 , 636 A.2d 392 (1994).

11999–1999
STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax District green
conn · 1985
2 sentences

1996To reach the merits of the issue on the appeal, which is whether the plaintiffs notice of claim satisfied General Statutes § 31-294c (a) and (b), 2 we must first determine if the appeal is taken from a final judgment. 3 Stroiney v. Crescent Lake Tax District, 197 Conn. 82, 84 , 495 A.2d 1063 (1985).

1996To reach the merits of the issue on the appeal, which is whether the plaintiffs notice of claim satisfied General Statutes § 31-294c (a) and (b), 2 we must first determine if the appeal is taken from a final judgment. 3 Stroiney v. Crescent Lake Tax District, 197 Conn. 82, 84 , 495 A.2d 1063 (1985).

11996–1996

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-294c (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-294 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 34 (1988–2015) CT 5 (1996–2009) VA 3 (1995–2002) ME 2 (1981–2001) NJ 2 (2007–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check