Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1991–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Henry
green
2 sentences1997“An unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes [that] did not reveal a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial or conduct that was not blatantly egregious.” State v. Henry, 27 Conn. App. 520, 529 , 608 A.2d 696 (1992). 1997“An unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes [that] did not reveal a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial or conduct that was not blatantly egregious.” State v. Henry, 27 Conn. App. 520, 529 , 608 A.2d 696 (1992). | 2 | 1992–1997 |
State v. Tweedy
green
2 sentences1992State v. Tweedy, 219 Conn. 489, 509 , 594 A.2d 906 (1991). 1992State v. Tweedy, 219 Conn. 489, 509 , 594 A.2d 906 (1991). | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Spearhead Construction Corp. v. Bianco
green
2 sentences1997“In determining whether a prosecutor’s conduct was so egregious as to deny a defendant a fair trial, we note that some leeway must be afforded to the advocates in offering arguments to the juiy in final argument.” State v. Hansen, 39 Conn. App. 384, 395 , 666 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 928 , 667 A.2d 554 (1995). 1997“In determining whether a prosecutor’s conduct was so egregious as to deny a defendant a fair trial, we note that some leeway must be afforded to the advocates in offering arguments to the juiy in final argument.” State v. Hansen, 39 Conn. App. 384, 395 , 666 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 928 , 667 A.2d 554 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Hansen
green
1 sentence1997“In determining whether a prosecutor’s conduct was so egregious as to deny a defendant a fair trial, we note that some leeway must be afforded to the advocates in offering arguments to the juiy in final argument.” State v. Hansen, 39 Conn. App. 384, 395 , 666 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 928 , 667 A.2d 554 (1995). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Pelletier
green
2 sentences1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted 1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted 1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Tedesco v. City of Stamford
green
1 sentence1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. King
green
1 sentence1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences1992The defendant seeks review solely under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 4 An unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not reveal a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct that was not blatantly egregious. 1992The defendant seeks review solely under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 4 An unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not reveal a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct that was not blatantly egregious. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. DeWitt
green
1 sentence1992“While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial ... an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not disclose a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct not blatantly egregious.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Hall, 28 Conn. App. 771, 778 , 612 A.2d 135 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 904 , 615 A.2d 1045 (1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Hall
green
1 sentence1992“While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial ... an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not disclose a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct not blatantly egregious.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Hall, 28 Conn. App. 771, 778 , 612 A.2d 135 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 904 , 615 A.2d 1045 (1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Peruta
green
2 sentences1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted 1992Because this claim also was not properly preserved at trial, the defendant again seeks review under State v. Golding, supra. While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial; State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 539 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987); State v. Pelletier, 196 Conn. 32, 33-34 , 490 A.2d 515 (1985); State v. Peruta, 24 Conn. App. 598, 608-609 , 591 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 912 , 593 A.2d 137 (1991); an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences1992“While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial ... an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not disclose a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct not blatantly egregious.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Hall, 28 Conn. App. 771, 778 , 612 A.2d 135 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 904 , 615 A.2d 1045 (1992). 1992“While prosecutorial misconduct of constitutional dimension may arise during closing argument, thereby implicating the fairness of a trial ... an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is not reviewable if the claimed misconduct consisted of isolated and brief episodes, did not disclose a pattern of conduct repeated throughout the trial, or conduct not blatantly egregious.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Hall, 28 Conn. App. 771, 778 , 612 A.2d 135 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 904 , 615 A.2d 1045 (1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Fullwood
green
2 sentences1991The defendant also contends that under State v. Fullwood, 194 Conn. 573, 584 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984), an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is reviewable if the prosecutor deliberately disregarded “established rules of fair play.” Simply stated, Fullwood , which involved a preserved prosecutorial misconduct claim, provides no authority for this contention. 1991The defendant also contends that under State v. Fullwood, 194 Conn. 573, 584 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984), an unpreserved prosecutorial misconduct claim is reviewable if the prosecutor deliberately disregarded “established rules of fair play.” Simply stated, Fullwood , which involved a preserved prosecutorial misconduct claim, provides no authority for this contention. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.