Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grace Community Church v. Planning & Zoning Commission
green
1 sentence2000It is well established that an administrative agency that has acted on a special permit is not allowed to reverse itself, unless a change of circumstances intervenes that materially affects the merits of the case, Grace Community Church v. Planning Zoning Commission , 42 Conn. Sup. 256 , 270 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Walton v. Arizona
red
2 sentences1999The defendant's claim that "the statute embodies a presumption of death once the state proves the existence of an aggravating factor . . . [is] foreclosed by the United States Supreme Court's . . . decision in Walton v. Arizona, [ 497 U.S. 639 , 649-52 , 110 S.Ct. 3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 , reh. denied, 497 U.S. 1050 , 111 S.Ct. 14 , 111 L.Ed.2d 828 (1990)]." State v. Ross, supra, 230 Conn. 241 . 1999The defendant's claim that "the statute embodies a presumption of death once the state proves the existence of an aggravating factor . . . [is] foreclosed by the United States Supreme Court's . . . decision in Walton v. Arizona, [ 497 U.S. 639 , 649-52 , 110 S.Ct. 3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 , reh. denied, 497 U.S. 1050 , 111 S.Ct. 14 , 111 L.Ed.2d 828 (1990)]." State v. Ross, supra, 230 Conn. 241 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
green
1 sentence1999The defendant's claim that "the statute embodies a presumption of death once the state proves the existence of an aggravating factor . . . [is] foreclosed by the United States Supreme Court's . . . decision in Walton v. Arizona, [ 497 U.S. 639 , 649-52 , 110 S.Ct. 3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 , reh. denied, 497 U.S. 1050 , 111 S.Ct. 14 , 111 L.Ed.2d 828 (1990)]." State v. Ross, supra, 230 Conn. 241 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence1998This claim is similar to one made in State v. Safford, 21 Conn. App. 467, 470 , 574 A.2d 1305 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 803 , 577 A.2d 717 (1990), where the separate incidents of sexual assault were charged and referred to during the voir dire, and after jury selection was completed but before the jury was sworn in, the state chose not to proceed with the charge as to the second incident. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Safford
green
1 sentence1998This claim is similar to one made in State v. Safford, 21 Conn. App. 467, 470 , 574 A.2d 1305 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 803 , 577 A.2d 717 (1990), where the separate incidents of sexual assault were charged and referred to during the voir dire, and after jury selection was completed but before the jury was sworn in, the state chose not to proceed with the charge as to the second incident. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Safford
green
2 sentences1998This claim is similar to one made in State v. Safford, 21 Conn. App. 467, 470 , 574 A.2d 1305 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 803 , 577 A.2d 717 (1990), where the separate incidents of sexual assault were charged and referred to during the voir dire, and after jury selection was completed but before the jury was sworn in, the state chose not to proceed with the charge as to the second incident. 1998This claim is similar to one made in State v. Safford, 21 Conn. App. 467, 470 , 574 A.2d 1305 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 803 , 577 A.2d 717 (1990), where the separate incidents of sexual assault were charged and referred to during the voir dire, and after jury selection was completed but before the jury was sworn in, the state chose not to proceed with the charge as to the second incident. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Martin
green
2 sentences1989In State v. Martin, 201 Conn. 74 , 513 A.2d 116 (1986), we drew a distinction between impeaching a witness on the basis of his prior convictions and impeaching him on the basis of specific acts of misconduct that indicate a lack of veracity, without mentioning the convictions. 1989In State v. Martin, 201 Conn. 74 , 513 A.2d 116 (1986), we drew a distinction between impeaching a witness on the basis of his prior convictions and impeaching him on the basis of specific acts of misconduct that indicate a lack of veracity, without mentioning the convictions. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Yeager v. Farwell
green
1 sentence1980The essence of the defendant Cosgrove’s argument is that, since Pierro did not testify, Cosgrove’s right of confrontation, secured *591 in these circumstances by Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S. Ct. 1620 , 20 L. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1980The essence of the defendant Cosgrove’s argument is that, since Pierro did not testify, Cosgrove’s right of confrontation, secured *591 in these circumstances by Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S. Ct. 1620 , 20 L. 1980The essence of the defendant Cosgrove’s argument is that, since Pierro did not testify, Cosgrove’s right of confrontation, secured *591 in these circumstances by Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S. Ct. 1620 , 20 L. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.