5 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moglen v. Varsity Pajamas, Inc.green2 sentences1985Moglen v. Varsity Pajamas, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 114, 115 , 213 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1001 (1961); Restatement, supra, § 652C comment d. 1985Moglen v. Varsity Pajamas, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 114, 115 , 213 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1001 (1961); Restatement, supra, § 652C comment d. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Safeway Stores, Inc.green1 sentence1977See, e. g., Jones v. Safeway Stores, Inc., D.C.App., 314 A.2d 459 (1974); The Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Pomeroy, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 239 F.2d 435 (1956); Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S. App.D.C. 102, 143 F.2d 142 (1944). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
District of Columbia v. Murphy
green
1 sentence2008We have recognized that “[t]he application of the directed verdict test to the issue of probable cause results in a curious double perspective that can make this case difficult to apprehend conceptually.” District of Columbia v. Murphy, 631 A.2d 34 , 37 n. 4 (D.C.1993). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
District of Columbia v. Davis
green
1 sentence1981Davis, supra. Under the circumstances, a directed verdict was not error. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Marshall v. District of Columbia
green
1 sentence1980Marshall v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 391 A.2d 1374 (1978); Keefer v. Keefer and Johnson, Inc., D.C. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.
green
1 sentence1977See, e. g., Jones v. Safeway Stores, Inc., D.C.App., 314 A.2d 459 (1974); The Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Pomeroy, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 239 F.2d 435 (1956); Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S. App.D.C. 102, 143 F.2d 142 (1944). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Robert Livingston Pomeroy, of the Estate of Elizabeth Eagan Pomeroy
green
1 sentence1977See, e. g., Jones v. Safeway Stores, Inc., D.C.App., 314 A.2d 459 (1974); The Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Pomeroy, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 239 F.2d 435 (1956); Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S. App.D.C. 102, 143 F.2d 142 (1944). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.