6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marigold Overshiner and Earl Overshiner, Individually and as Parents and Guardians of their Minor Daughter, Kaitlyn Overshiner v. Hendricks Regional Health and Ian Johnston, M.D.green1 sentence2024Overshiner v. Hendricks Reg’l Health, 119 N.E.3d 1124, 1131 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ollis v. Knecht
green
1 sentence2016Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A05-1509-CT-1364 | June 15, 2016 Page 7 of 10 A. Motion in Limine [15] In support of their motion in limine, Jerry and Bernadette cited our decision in Ollis v. Knecht, 751 N.E.2d 825 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), reh’g denied, which they said stands for the proposition that a plaintiff seeking damages for impairment of earning capacity must present the testimony of an expert witness. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Pearson v. State
green
1 sentence1983Pearson v. State, (1982) Ind., 441 N.E.2d 468 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Blow v. State
green
1 sentence1979Blow v. State, (1978) Ind., 372 N.E.2d 1166, 1167 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Carmon v. State
neutral
2 sentences1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . 1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Carroll v. State
green
2 sentences1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . 1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Mendez v. State
green
2 sentences1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . 1978Mendez v. State, (1977) 267 Ind. 67 , 367 N.E.2d 1081 ; Carmon v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 1 , 349 N.E.2d 167 ; Carroll v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 696 , 338 N.E.2d 264 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Blume, Kissinger v. State
green
2 sentences1975But White overlooks Blume *102 v. State (1963), 244 Ind. 121, 129 , 189 N.E.2d 568, 572 , which states, on the sole authority of 23 C.J.S. 98, Criminal Law § 1085, that it “has the further purpose of informing the accused of the contemplated course of the prosecution, so as to enable him to meet the charge against him.” A strict application of the logic of the White decision to that dicta from Blmne plus the fact that Indiana’s statute requires the prosecutor to “state the case of the prosecution and briefly state the evidence by which he expects to support it” 3 would tend to classify Indiana 1975But White overlooks Blume *102 v. State (1963), 244 Ind. 121, 129 , 189 N.E.2d 568, 572 , which states, on the sole authority of 23 C.J.S. 98, Criminal Law § 1085, that it “has the further purpose of informing the accused of the contemplated course of the prosecution, so as to enable him to meet the charge against him.” A strict application of the logic of the White decision to that dicta from Blmne plus the fact that Indiana’s statute requires the prosecutor to “state the case of the prosecution and briefly state the evidence by which he expects to support it” 3 would tend to classify Indiana | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.