Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. Michigangreen1 sentence2024See Lizzol, 2007- NMSC-024, ¶ 15 (“[T]he [s]tate is barred from appealing when a defendant is acquitted by the trial court no matter how egregiously erroneous the trial court’s ruling.” (second alteration in original)); Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313, 320 (2013) (“[A]n acquittal due to insufficient evidence precludes retrial, whether the court’s evaluation of the evidence was ‘correct or not,’ and regardless of whether the court’s decision flowed from an incorrect antecedent ruling of law.” (citation omitted)). {22} We also agree with the State that the district court erred to the extent that | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2008See State v. Smith, 51 N.M. 184, 189 , 181 P.2d 800, 803 (1947). 2008See State v. Smith, 51 N.M. 184, 189 , 181 P.2d 800, 803 (1947). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McElhannon v. Ford
green
2 sentences2011Defendant cites to 13 McElhannon v. Ford, 2003-NMCA-091, ¶¶ 16-17 , 134 N.M. 124 , 73 P.3d 827 , where 14 we held that the UPA does not apply to cases where goods and services are combined 15 to create a structure that is permanently affixed realty. 2011Defendant cites to 13 McElhannon v. Ford, 2003-NMCA-091, ¶¶ 16-17 , 134 N.M. 124 , 73 P.3d 827 , where 14 we held that the UPA does not apply to cases where goods and services are combined 15 to create a structure that is permanently affixed realty. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Gallardo v. Santini Fertilizer Co.
green
1 sentence1961Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 , 48 S.Ct. 24 , 72 L.Ed. 167 , 56 A.L.R. 645 , or what is commonly called the “Pennsylvania Rule” which places an affirmative duty on one who crosses railroad tracks not only to “stop, look, and listen” but to continue vigilant to a point beyond peril or be regarded negligent as a matter of law. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Goodman
green
2 sentences1961Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 , 48 S.Ct. 24 , 72 L.Ed. 167 , 56 A.L.R. 645 , or what is commonly called the “Pennsylvania Rule” which places an affirmative duty on one who crosses railroad tracks not only to “stop, look, and listen” but to continue vigilant to a point beyond peril or be regarded negligent as a matter of law. 1961Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 , 48 S.Ct. 24 , 72 L.Ed. 167 , 56 A.L.R. 645 , or what is commonly called the “Pennsylvania Rule” which places an affirmative duty on one who crosses railroad tracks not only to “stop, look, and listen” but to continue vigilant to a point beyond peril or be regarded negligent as a matter of law. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Sanchez v. Gomez
green
2 sentences1957The directed verdict rule in this jurisdiction was stated by this court in Sanchez v. Gomez, 1953, 57 N.M. 383 , 259 P.2d 346, 348 , as follows: “It is now well established that before the trial court may properly remove a case from the jury it should appear that no true issues of fact have been presented, for it is a party’s right to have such issues decided by the judgment of his peers under provisions of state and federal constitution. 1957The directed verdict rule in this jurisdiction was stated by this court in Sanchez v. Gomez, 1953, 57 N.M. 383 , 259 P.2d 346, 348 , as follows: “It is now well established that before the trial court may properly remove a case from the jury it should appear that no true issues of fact have been presented, for it is a party’s right to have such issues decided by the judgment of his peers under provisions of state and federal constitution. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co.
neutral
1 sentence1953Secs. 19-101(54) (d), 19-201(22) (1), N.M.Stats.Ann., 1941 Comp.; Gallup Electric Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co., 1911, 16 N.M. 279 , 117 P. 845 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.