assigned error in Indiana

43 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1865–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Frazer v. McMillin & Carsongreen indctapp · 1932 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1967–1969 2 sentences 1969Frazer v. McMillin & Carson (1932), 94 Ind. App. 431 , 179 N. E. 564 ; Kunkel, Trustee, etc. v. Arnold (1960), 131 Ind. App. 219 , 158 N. E. 2d 660 . 1969Frazer v. McMillin & Carson (1932), 94 Ind. App. 431 , 179 N. E. 564 ; Kunkel, Trustee, etc. v. Arnold (1960), 131 Ind. App. 219 , 158 N. E. 2d 660 .	1	3
Kocher v. Getzgreen ind · 2005 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006That issue, and the respective rights of the plaintiff, the surety, and the insurance company in the event the plaintiff is unsuccessful in recovering more than coverage limits in her prosecution of the assigned claim against the defendant's insurer, involve issues and parties not presented in the case now before this Court. 824 N.E.2d at 675 (emphasis added). 2006That issue, and the respective rights of the plaintiff, the surety, and the insurance company in the event the plaintiff is unsuccessful in recovering more than coverage limits in her prosecution of the assigned claim against the defendant's insurer, involve issues and parties not presented in the case now before this Court. 824 N.E.2d at 675 (emphasis added).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (56)

Case	Cited	Years
Town of Lagrange v. Sears neutral ind · 1938 2 sentences 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 . 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 .	2	1963–1970
Reid v. Reid green ind · 1898 2 sentences 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 . 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 .	2	1963–1970
Zimmerman v. Gaumer green ind · 1899 2 sentences 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 . 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 .	2	1963–1970
White v. Fatout green ind · 1899 2 sentences 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 . 1970Town of LaGrange v. Sears (1938), 213 Ind. 320 , 12 N. E. 2d 503 ; Zimmerman v. Gaumer (1899), 152 Ind. 552, 555 , 53 N. E. 829 ; White v. Fatout (1899), 152 Ind. 126 , 52 N. E. 700 ; Reid v. Reid et al. (1898), 149 Ind. 274 , 49 N. E. 2 .	2	1963–1970
KUNKEL, TRUSTEE, ETC. v. Arnold neutral indctapp · 1959 2 sentences 1969Frazer v. McMillin & Carson (1932), 94 Ind. App. 431 , 179 N. E. 564 ; Kunkel, Trustee, etc. v. Arnold (1960), 131 Ind. App. 219 , 158 N. E. 2d 660 . 1969Frazer v. McMillin & Carson (1932), 94 Ind. App. 431 , 179 N. E. 564 ; Kunkel, Trustee, etc. v. Arnold (1960), 131 Ind. App. 219 , 158 N. E. 2d 660 .	2	1969–1969
Bane v. Keefer green ind · 1899 2 sentences 1924Bane v. Keefer (1899), 152 Ind. 544 . 1915Bane v. Keefer (1899), 152 Ind. 544 , 53 N. E. 834 ; United States, etc., Ins.	2	1915–1924
INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. Lee green indctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2003INS Investigations Bureau, 709 N.E.2d at 787 .	1	2003–2003
Phillips v. State green ind · 1978 2 sentences 1984In Phillips v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 556, 561 , 376 N.E.2d 1143, 1146 , the assigned error was an indiscreet comment made by the court's bailiff to one of the jurors. 1984In Phillips v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 556, 561 , 376 N.E.2d 1143, 1146 , the assigned error was an indiscreet comment made by the court's bailiff to one of the jurors.	1	1984–1984
Misenheimer v. State green ind · 1978 2 sentences 1978Mischeimer v. State (1978), 268 Ind. 274 , 374 N.E.2d 523, 532 . 1978Mischeimer v. State (1978), 268 Ind. 274 , 374 N.E.2d 523, 532 .	1	1978–1978
In Re the Marrage of Miles green indctapp · 1977 2 sentences 1977Furthermore, there was no dispute regarding the value of the other major assets. 7 (Compare, In re Marriage of Miles (1977), 173 Ind. App. 5 , 362 N.E.2d 171 , for the effect of imprecise valuations in establishing abuse of discretion.) Accordingly, the assigned error is reduced to determining whether the court abused its discretion in awarding the property as it did. 1977Furthermore, there was no dispute regarding the value of the other major assets. 7 (Compare, In re Marriage of Miles (1977), 173 Ind. App. 5 , 362 N.E.2d 171 , for the effect of imprecise valuations in establishing abuse of discretion.) Accordingly, the assigned error is reduced to determining whether the court abused its discretion in awarding the property as it did.	1	1977–1977
Miles v. State neutral indctapp · 1972 2 sentences 1974Thus, where the sole assigned error is the overruling of a motion for new trial, and all the grounds of the motion depend upon the evidence, which is not in the record, the judgment below will be affirmed.’ ” The case of Miles v. State (1972), 152 Ind. App. 566 , 284 N.E.2d 551 , like the case now before us, was an appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of Marion County, which in turn was an appeal from the Municipal Court of Marion County. 1974Thus, where the sole assigned error is the overruling of a motion for new trial, and all the grounds of the motion depend upon the evidence, which is not in the record, the judgment below will be affirmed.’ ” The case of Miles v. State (1972), 152 Ind. App. 566 , 284 N.E.2d 551 , like the case now before us, was an appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of Marion County, which in turn was an appeal from the Municipal Court of Marion County.	1	1974–1974
Hardy v. Town of New Harmony, Indiana green ind · 1967 2 sentences 1970Hardy et al. v. Town of New Harmony, Indiana, et al. (1967), 248 Ind. 350 , 227 N. E. 2d 689 . 1970Hardy et al. v. Town of New Harmony, Indiana, et al. (1967), 248 Ind. 350 , 227 N. E. 2d 689 .	1	1970–1970
Bewley v. State green ind · 1966 2 sentences 1970Bewley v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 652 , 220 N. E. 2d 612 ; Greenwalt v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 608 , 209 N. E. 2d 254 . 1970Bewley v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 652 , 220 N. E. 2d 612 ; Greenwalt v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 608 , 209 N. E. 2d 254 .	1	1970–1970
Greenwalt v. State neutral ind · 1965 2 sentences 1970Bewley v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 652 , 220 N. E. 2d 612 ; Greenwalt v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 608 , 209 N. E. 2d 254 . 1970Bewley v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 652 , 220 N. E. 2d 612 ; Greenwalt v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 608 , 209 N. E. 2d 254 .	1	1970–1970
Larson v. Smitley neutral indctapp · 1967 2 sentences 1970In the case of Larson v. Smitley (1967), 141 Ind. App. 363 , 258 228 N. E. 2d 31 , the assigned error on appeal was the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. 1970In the case of Larson v. Smitley (1967), 141 Ind. App. 363 , 258 228 N. E. 2d 31 , the assigned error on appeal was the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.	1	1970–1970
Hayden v. State green ind · 1964 2 sentences 1969Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 14 Ind. Dec. 233 , 236 N. E. 2d 597 , Rule 2-6, Rules Indiana Supreme Court. 429 In the Groce case this Court recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, citing Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591, 599 , 3 Ind. Dec. 492 , 199 N. E. 2d 102 , 3 Ind. Dec. 753 , 201 N. E. 2d 329 . 1969Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 14 Ind. Dec. 233 , 236 N. E. 2d 597 , Rule 2-6, Rules Indiana Supreme Court. 429 In the Groce case this Court recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, citing Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591, 599 , 3 Ind. Dec. 492 , 199 N. E. 2d 102 , 3 Ind. Dec. 753 , 201 N. E. 2d 329 .	1	1969–1969
Groce v. State green ind · 1968 2 sentences 1969Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 14 Ind. Dec. 233 , 236 N. E. 2d 597 , Rule 2-6, Rules Indiana Supreme Court. 429 In the Groce case this Court recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, citing Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591, 599 , 3 Ind. Dec. 492 , 199 N. E. 2d 102 , 3 Ind. Dec. 753 , 201 N. E. 2d 329 . 1969Groce v. State (1968), 250 Ind. 582 , 14 Ind. Dec. 233 , 236 N. E. 2d 597 , Rule 2-6, Rules Indiana Supreme Court. 429 In the Groce case this Court recognized an exception to the foregoing rule, citing Hayden v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 591, 599 , 3 Ind. Dec. 492 , 199 N. E. 2d 102 , 3 Ind. Dec. 753 , 201 N. E. 2d 329 .	1	1969–1969
Kennedy v. State neutral ind · 1935 2 sentences 1968Kennedy v. State (1935), 209 Ind. 287 , 196 N. E. 316 ; McCanahan v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 317 , 117 N. E. 2d 749 .” Causes numbered 7C, 7D, 7R, 7S and 7T of the Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial assigned as error' the trial court’s refusal to give to the jury defendant’s instructions numbered 6, 7, 26, 27 and 28, all of which would have instructed the jury concerning independent contractors. 1968Kennedy v. State (1935), 209 Ind. 287 , 196 N. E. 316 ; McCanahan v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 317 , 117 N. E. 2d 749 .” Causes numbered 7C, 7D, 7R, 7S and 7T of the Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial assigned as error' the trial court’s refusal to give to the jury defendant’s instructions numbered 6, 7, 26, 27 and 28, all of which would have instructed the jury concerning independent contractors.	1	1968–1968
Hendrickson v. State green ind · 1954 2 sentences 1968Hendrickson v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 341 , 118 N. E. 2d 493 . 1968Hendrickson v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 341 , 118 N. E. 2d 493 .	1	1968–1968
McClanahan v. State neutral ind · 1954 2 sentences 1968Kennedy v. State (1935), 209 Ind. 287 , 196 N. E. 316 ; McCanahan v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 317 , 117 N. E. 2d 749 .” Causes numbered 7C, 7D, 7R, 7S and 7T of the Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial assigned as error' the trial court’s refusal to give to the jury defendant’s instructions numbered 6, 7, 26, 27 and 28, all of which would have instructed the jury concerning independent contractors. 1968Kennedy v. State (1935), 209 Ind. 287 , 196 N. E. 316 ; McCanahan v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 317 , 117 N. E. 2d 749 .” Causes numbered 7C, 7D, 7R, 7S and 7T of the Appellant’s Motion for a New Trial assigned as error' the trial court’s refusal to give to the jury defendant’s instructions numbered 6, 7, 26, 27 and 28, all of which would have instructed the jury concerning independent contractors.	1	1968–1968
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman green scotus · 1953 1 sentence 1965In support of the assigned error thut the. decision is . contrary to law,- appellant, presents the following argument: ' “By that act, (National Labor Relations^Act) appellee- surrendered to ■ his Uniom.-al] ,-rights to negotiate, with his employer the terms and,,conditions of his employment and Un'y action taken'-by' it binds him as though he personally sd: acted in-the absence of a breach of trust ontheparhof. his union which is neither allegednor. ,pr.pven. " When his Union agreed that the rights of employees on layoff and .recall would be .governed by ’ their seniority on the shift on whic	1	1965–1965
Miller v. Wabash Fire & Casualty Insurance neutral indctapp · 1963 2 sentences 1964Miller, Admr. v. Wabash Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al. (1963), 135 Ind. App. 381 , 193 N. E. 2d 917 , pts. 1 and 2. 1964Miller, Admr. v. Wabash Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al. (1963), 135 Ind. App. 381 , 193 N. E. 2d 917 , pts. 1 and 2.	1	1964–1964
Stafford v. Searfoss, Etc. green indctapp · 1960 2 sentences 1963This should then be followed by a concise statement of the basis of objection to the complained of ruling, together with an exhibition of all pertinent points of faet and law sought to be presented and how they are applicable to the matter or particular error being discussed.” (Emphasis supplied.) See also: Wyman v. Turpen (1962), 133 Ind. App. 135 , 179 N. E. 2d 758 ; Stafford et al. v. Searfoss, Executor etc. (1960), 131 Ind. App. 274, 278 , 170 N. E. 2d 252 . 1963This should then be followed by a concise statement of the basis of objection to the complained of ruling, together with an exhibition of all pertinent points of faet and law sought to be presented and how they are applicable to the matter or particular error being discussed.” (Emphasis supplied.) See also: Wyman v. Turpen (1962), 133 Ind. App. 135 , 179 N. E. 2d 758 ; Stafford et al. v. Searfoss, Executor etc. (1960), 131 Ind. App. 274, 278 , 170 N. E. 2d 252 .	1	1963–1963
Wyman v. Turpen neutral indctapp · 1962 2 sentences 1963This should then be followed by a concise statement of the basis of objection to the complained of ruling, together with an exhibition of all pertinent points of faet and law sought to be presented and how they are applicable to the matter or particular error being discussed.” (Emphasis supplied.) See also: Wyman v. Turpen (1962), 133 Ind. App. 135 , 179 N. E. 2d 758 ; Stafford et al. v. Searfoss, Executor etc. (1960), 131 Ind. App. 274, 278 , 170 N. E. 2d 252 . 1963This should then be followed by a concise statement of the basis of objection to the complained of ruling, together with an exhibition of all pertinent points of faet and law sought to be presented and how they are applicable to the matter or particular error being discussed.” (Emphasis supplied.) See also: Wyman v. Turpen (1962), 133 Ind. App. 135 , 179 N. E. 2d 758 ; Stafford et al. v. Searfoss, Executor etc. (1960), 131 Ind. App. 274, 278 , 170 N. E. 2d 252 .	1	1963–1963
Johnson v. State neutral ind · 1954 2 sentences 1963Johnson v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 376 , 119 N. E. 2d 717 ; §2277, Flanagan, Wiltrout & Hamilton’s Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, 1961 Pocket Part. 1963Johnson v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 376 , 119 N. E. 2d 717 ; §2277, Flanagan, Wiltrout & Hamilton’s Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, 1961 Pocket Part.	1	1963–1963
Dipert, Admx., Etc. v. Killingbeck, Etc. green indctapp · 1953 2 sentences 1957Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis (1953) 232 Ind. 551 , 114 N. E. 2d 873 ; Dipert Admx., etc. v. Killingbeck et al. (1953), 124 Ind. App. 18 , 112 N. E. 2d 306 . 1957Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis (1953) 232 Ind. 551 , 114 N. E. 2d 873 ; Dipert Admx., etc. v. Killingbeck et al. (1953), 124 Ind. App. 18 , 112 N. E. 2d 306 .	1	1957–1957
Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis green ind · 1953 2 sentences 1957Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis (1953) 232 Ind. 551 , 114 N. E. 2d 873 ; Dipert Admx., etc. v. Killingbeck et al. (1953), 124 Ind. App. 18 , 112 N. E. 2d 306 . 1957Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis (1953) 232 Ind. 551 , 114 N. E. 2d 873 ; Dipert Admx., etc. v. Killingbeck et al. (1953), 124 Ind. App. 18 , 112 N. E. 2d 306 .	1	1957–1957
Costa v. Costa green indctapp · 1953	1	1955–1955
Terre Haute Traction & Light Co. v. Payne neutral indctapp · 1909 2 sentences 1955Appellant’s sole authority in support of this assigned error is the case of Terre Haute Traction, etc., Co. v. Payne (1910), 45 Ind. App. 132 , 89 N. E. 413 . 1955Appellant’s sole authority in support of this assigned error is the case of Terre Haute Traction, etc., Co. v. Payne (1910), 45 Ind. App. 132 , 89 N. E. 413 .	1	1955–1955
Wilson v. State green ind · 1943	1	1954–1954
New Albany Trust Company v. Nadorff neutral indctapp · 1940	1	1951–1951
Watson v. Tindall green ind · 1898	1	1951–1951
Woodward v. Mitchell green ind · 1895	1	1951–1951
Scanlin v. Stewart neutral ind · 1894	1	1951–1951
Fry v. Hare neutral ind · 1906	1	1951–1951
Karas v. Skouras green indctapp · 1922	1	1951–1951
Pilgrim v. Pilgrim green indctapp · 1947	1	1948–1948
Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Scribner green · 1911	1	1943–1943
James C. Curtis & Co. v. Emmerling neutral ind · 1941	1	1941–1941
Carmody v. State neutral ind · 1912	1	1938–1938

Where else courts name it

OH 416 (1908–2026) LA 149 (1978–2026) NE 112 (1881–2026) IA 53 (1864–1986) WA 52 (1896–2026) MS 48 (1844–2018) IN 43 (1865–2006) OR 40 (1876–2025) CA 37 (1863–2016) TX 34 (1879–2026) MO 34 (1866–2005) IL 32 (1886–2014) VA 29 (1908–2026) OK 29 (1908–2026) PA 24 (1867–2016) NY 24 (1883–2025) GA 21 (1881–1997) AL 20 (1852–1975) FL 19 (1939–2025) MN 16 (1886–1983) MI 16 (1878–2025) NC 14 (1886–2018) CO 14 (1901–2013) WV 14 (1920–2023) NV 11 (1959–2020) CT 10 (1891–2024) TN 10 (1925–2025) AZ 8 (1918–2019) ID 6 (1867–1954) NJ 6 (1993–2021) MT 5 (1923–1995) WY 5 (1892–1975) KS 5 (1895–1989) SD 5 (1894–1983) WI 5 (1901–2021) UT 4 (1911–2017) AR 4 (1931–1983) SC 4 (1909–2021) HI 3 (1976–2013) DC 3 (1944–1997) NM 3 (1936–2023) ND 3 (1907–1962) ME 3 (1975–2015) AK 3 (1999–2025) KY 3 (1908–2010) VT 2 (1925–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check