Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.red2 sentences2026First, an otherwise contractually valid forum selection clause should not be enforced if contrary to public policy.111 Second, an otherwise contractually valid forum selection clause should not be enforced if it is unreasonable.112 109 John F. Coyle, “Contractually Valid” Forum Selection Clauses, 108 Iowa L. Rev. 127 , 142 (2022). 110 Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 9-12, 18-20 (1972). 111 Id. at 15 (“A contractual choice-of-forum clause should be held unenforceable if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought, whether declared by st 2026First, an otherwise contractually valid forum selection clause should not be enforced if contrary to public policy.111 Second, an otherwise contractually valid forum selection clause should not be enforced if it is unreasonable.112 109 John F. Coyle, “Contractually Valid” Forum Selection Clauses, 108 Iowa L. Rev. 127 , 142 (2022). 110 Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 9-12, 18-20 (1972). 111 Id. at 15 (“A contractual choice-of-forum clause should be held unenforceable if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought, whether declared by st | 5 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.