Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dohnal v. Syndicated Offices Systemsgreen1 sentence1992The court’s decision was not “arbitrary or contrary to all the evidence.” See In re Estate of Goldman, 79 So.2d 846, 848 (Fla.1955); see also Dohnal v. Syndicated Offices Sys., 529 So.2d 267 (Fla.1988). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Goldman's Estategreen1 sentence1992The court’s decision was not “arbitrary or contrary to all the evidence.” See In re Estate of Goldman, 79 So.2d 846, 848 (Fla.1955); see also Dohnal v. Syndicated Offices Sys., 529 So.2d 267 (Fla.1988). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Herskowitzgreen1 sentence1985In re Estate of Herskowitz, 342 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. den. 360 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1978); In re Estate of Matchett, 394 So.2d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), reh. den. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Pridgeon
green
2 sentences2006In re Pridgeon's Estate, 349 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). 1979The statutory requirement of Section 733.705(3) contains the following: (3) The claimant shall be limited to 30 days from the date of service of an objection within which to bring an independent action upon the claim, (emphasis added) “Independent action” as defined in Costin v. Estate of Pridgeon, 349 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), requires “the filing of a separate action upon a claim against an estate to which an objection has been filed . .” This requirement allows pleadings and responses sufficient to set the issues before the court prior to hearing. | 3 | 1978–2006 |
In Re Estate of Matchett
green
1 sentence1985In re Estate of Herskowitz, 342 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. den. 360 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1978); In re Estate of Matchett, 394 So.2d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), reh. den. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Herskowitz v. Herskowitz
neutral
1 sentence1985In re Estate of Herskowitz, 342 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. den. 360 So.2d 378 (Fla. 1978); In re Estate of Matchett, 394 So.2d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), reh. den. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
In Re Estate of Sale
green
1 sentence1978“This Court, in the exercise of its discretion in this probate proceeding, has the authority to extend the time for filing an independent action after objection to a claim is filed for good cause shown [Florida Statute 733.705(3)] and to do so for good cause shown even after the time has expired under Florida Statute 733.705(3) for the filing of an independent action [In Re Estate of Sale (Fla.1969) 227 So.2d 199 ; In Re Estate of Verdier (Fla.[App.] 1973) 281 So.2d 543 ; In Re Estate of Pridgeon (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) 349 So.2d 741 .] “This Court finds that good cause has been shown for the gran | 1 | 1978–1978 |
In Re Estate of Verdier
green
1 sentence1978“This Court, in the exercise of its discretion in this probate proceeding, has the authority to extend the time for filing an independent action after objection to a claim is filed for good cause shown [Florida Statute 733.705(3)] and to do so for good cause shown even after the time has expired under Florida Statute 733.705(3) for the filing of an independent action [In Re Estate of Sale (Fla.1969) 227 So.2d 199 ; In Re Estate of Verdier (Fla.[App.] 1973) 281 So.2d 543 ; In Re Estate of Pridgeon (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) 349 So.2d 741 .] “This Court finds that good cause has been shown for the gran | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.