Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gillis v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . 2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . | 2 | 2 |
CAM v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("We review de novo the adequacy of Miranda warnings, as a question of law.") (citing C.A.M. v. State, 819 So.2d 802, 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)), review denied sub nom. 2006Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("We review de novo the adequacy of Miranda warnings, as a question of law.") (citing C.A.M. v. State, 819 So.2d 802, 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)), review denied sub nom. | 2 | 2 |
Roberts v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . 2006Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("We review de novo the adequacy of Miranda warnings, as a question of law.") (citing C.A.M. v. State, 819 So.2d 802, 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)), review denied sub nom. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Octave v. State
green
2 sentences2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . 2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Maxwell v. State
green
2 sentences2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . 2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
West v. State
green
2 sentences2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . 2007See, e.g., Gillis v. State, 930 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Octave, 925 So.2d 1128 ; Maxwell, 917 So.2d 404 ; West, 876 So.2d 614 ; Roberts, 874 So.2d 1225 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Duckworth v. Eagan
green
2 sentences2011Turning to the sufficiency of the warnings, the Court explained that when reviewing the adequacy of Miranda warnings, “[t]he inquiry is simply whether the warnings reasonably ‘conve[y] to [a suspect] his rights as required by Miranda.’ ” Id. at 1204 (quoting Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195, 203 , 109 S.Ct. 2875 , 106 L.Ed.2d 166 (1989)). 2011Turning to the sufficiency of the warnings, the Court explained that when reviewing the adequacy of Miranda warnings, “[t]he inquiry is simply whether the warnings reasonably ‘conve[y] to [a suspect] his rights as required by Miranda.’ ” Id. at 1204 (quoting Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195, 203 , 109 S.Ct. 2875 , 106 L.Ed.2d 166 (1989)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. West
green
1 sentence2006State v. West, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.