case constituted violation in Florida

2014Aluminum Corp. v. Dobkin, 458 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (reversing and remanding for new trial where counsel brought to the jury’s attention the fact that a witness was once a defendant in the lawsuit even if it was only to rebut opposing counsel’s reference to the witness as an independent eyewitness); Jordan, 186 So.2d at 63 (rejecting the proposition that evidence of settlement may be allowed where opposing counsel opened the door to the line of questioning.) Thus, because we hold that, as in Webb, Green and Loyola , the repeated references to' Perez’s status as a former defendant in thi

2014Finally, we must consider the case of Harris v. Grunow, 71 So.3d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

2003As noted in Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 781 So.2d at 1065 : "When a trial court fails to act in accord with the statute and procedural rule on a motion to disqualify, an appellate court will vacate a trial court judgment that flows from that error." Here, the trial judge's failure to rule on Shah's recusal motion until after deciding the merits of the case constituted error.

1997Mordenti, 630 So.2d at 1084 .

1996The court concluded that the undercover operation involved egregious law enforcement conduct and constituted entrapment as a matter of law. *1210 The Florida Supreme Court has said, "[I]n the presence of egregious law enforcement conduct, an entrapment defense is to be evaluated under the due process provision of article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution as in [ State v. ] Glosson [, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1985),] and [ State v. ] Williams [, 623 So.2d 462 (Fla.1993)]." Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d at 99 .

1996The court concluded that the undercover operation involved egregious law enforcement conduct and constituted entrapment as a matter of law. *1210 The Florida Supreme Court has said, "[I]n the presence of egregious law enforcement conduct, an entrapment defense is to be evaluated under the due process provision of article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution as in [ State v. ] Glosson [, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1985),] and [ State v. ] Williams [, 623 So.2d 462 (Fla.1993)]." Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d at 99 .

1996The court concluded that the undercover operation involved egregious law enforcement conduct and constituted entrapment as a matter of law. *1210 The Florida Supreme Court has said, "[I]n the presence of egregious law enforcement conduct, an entrapment defense is to be evaluated under the due process provision of article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution as in [ State v. ] Glosson [, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1985),] and [ State v. ] Williams [, 623 So.2d 462 (Fla.1993)]." Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d at 99 .

1981There was surely no harmful error, requiring a new trial, in the court's refusal to permit Damon to make a reciprocally meaningless comment. [7] Their argument that the references in Damon's confession to prior instances in which they had employed the same scheme as the one involved in this case constituted a violation of the rule of Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959) is without substance.

1981Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685 (Fla. 1972); Hamilton v. State, 356 So.2d 30 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1978). [8] The same is true of the subsequent cases which have followed Pinder .

1981Ashley v. State, 265 So.2d 685 (Fla. 1972); Hamilton v. State, 356 So.2d 30 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1978). [8] The same is true of the subsequent cases which have followed Pinder .