Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Daytona Beach v. Del Perciogreen1 sentence2015The court held that the improper comment constituted fundamental error and remanded for resentencing before a different judge, Id, at 679-80 (citing City of Daytona Beach v. Del Percio, 476 So.2d 197, 206 (Fla.1985)). | 1 | 1 |
McDonald v. Stategreen1 sentence2013We have consistently observed fundamental error as the type of error that “reaches down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.” Brooks v. State, 762 So.2d 879, 899 (Fla.2000) (quoting McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501, 505 (Fla.1999)). | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Stategreen1 sentence2013We have consistently observed fundamental error as the type of error that “reaches down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.” Brooks v. State, 762 So.2d 879, 899 (Fla.2000) (quoting McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501, 505 (Fla.1999)). | 1 | 1 |
Nurse v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See id. | 1 | 1 |
Urbin v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See Urbin v. State, 714 So.2d 411 (Fla.1998); Richardson v. State, 604 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1992); Rhodes v. State, 547 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Bertolotti v. Stategreen1 sentence1988On appeal, Erwin relies on Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130, 134 (Fla. *726 1985), and now contends that this comment constituted fundamental error because of its inflammatory pitting of class against class. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rhodes v. State
green
1 sentence1999See Urbin v. State, 714 So.2d 411 (Fla.1998); Richardson v. State, 604 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1992); Rhodes v. State, 547 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1989). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Richardson v. State
green
1 sentence1999See Urbin v. State, 714 So.2d 411 (Fla.1998); Richardson v. State, 604 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1992); Rhodes v. State, 547 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1989). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.