Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1918–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Trotter v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Regarding the trial court denying defense counsel’s cause challenge, “[w]here a defendant seeks reversal based on a claim that he was wrongfully forced to exhaust his peremptory challenges, he initially must identify a specific juror whom he otherwise would have struck peremptorily.” Trotter v. State, 576 So. 2d 691, 693 (Fla. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
Cabrera v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). | 1 | 1 |
LAW AND INFO. SERV. v. Riviera Beachgreen1 sentence2010Servs., Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). *200 Given this body of law construing the Government in the Sunshine Law and appellants’ failure to disclose relevant authority to the contrary, we find no error in the trial court’s denying the challenge to the City’s use of the consent agenda. | 1 | 1 |
Dade Canvas Products Co. v. Ewinggreen1 sentence1976See also Payton v. State, 200 So.2d 255 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), where the court held that ordinarily the question of self-defense is one of fact to be determined by the trier of fact. [2] The second point that we shall address ourselves to is that concerning the alleged error of the trial court in denying defense counsel's request for a full reinstruction of the jury as to self-defense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peadon v. State
green
1 sentence1918Peadon v. State, 46 Fla. 124 , 35 South. | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.