Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Powell v. Barnesgreen2 sentences2019However, the court found that, since the compromise was in *751 the Koballa case, Lewis was not precluded from seeking "whatever portion wasn't paid." The court concluded that the subject costs were not a "double dip." "The prevailing party's burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is 'to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.' " Gray v. Bradbury , 668 So.2d 296 , 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quoting Powell v. Barnes , 629 So. 2d 185 , 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) ). 2019However, the court found that, since the compromise was in *751 the Koballa case, Lewis was not precluded from seeking "whatever portion wasn't paid." The court concluded that the subject costs were not a "double dip." "The prevailing party's burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is 'to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.' " Gray v. Bradbury , 668 So.2d 296 , 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quoting Powell v. Barnes , 629 So. 2d 185 , 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) ). | 2 | 5 |
Gray v. Bradburygreen2 sentences2019However, the court found that, since the compromise was in *751 the Koballa case, Lewis was not precluded from seeking "whatever portion wasn't paid." The court concluded that the subject costs were not a "double dip." "The prevailing party's burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is 'to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.' " Gray v. Bradbury , 668 So.2d 296 , 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quoting Powell v. Barnes , 629 So. 2d 185 , 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) ). 2019However, the court found that, since the compromise was in *751 the Koballa case, Lewis was not precluded from seeking "whatever portion wasn't paid." The court concluded that the subject costs were not a "double dip." "The prevailing party's burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is 'to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.' " Gray v. Bradbury , 668 So.2d 296 , 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quoting Powell v. Barnes , 629 So. 2d 185 , 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) ). | 2 | 4 |
Oak Square Joint Venture, a Florida etc. v. U. S. Bank National Association, etc.green1 sentence2015At this point, the Alarios had the opportunity and the burden to present competent evidence that *1142 their requested expert fees were both reasonable and necessary. “ ‘The prevailing party’s burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is “to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.” ’ ” Oak Square Joint Venture v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 143 So.3d 971, 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (quoting Gray v. Bradbury, 668 So.2d 296, 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||