Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See Armstrong v. State, 679 So.2d 1282, 1283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Riggins v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See Riggins v. State, 830 So.2d 920 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Pain v. United Technologies Corp.green2 sentences1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Dow Chemical Co.green2 sentences1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Pain v. United Technologies Corp.green2 sentences1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Colmenares-Hernandez v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 1996See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2005Gilbert claimed that if counsel had been effective by investigating and deposing Perez, he would have proceeded to a revocation hearing rather than admitting the violations. *86 The postconviction court denied Gilbert's claim as failing to prove the prejudice prong of the test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2005Gilbert claimed that if counsel had been effective by investigating and deposing Perez, he would have proceeded to a revocation hearing rather than admitting the violations. *86 The postconviction court denied Gilbert's claim as failing to prove the prejudice prong of the test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Sandlin v. CR. JUST. STANDARDS & TR. COM'N
green
1 sentence1996Gilbert asserts that, because his civil rights were restored through the governor's constitutional power to grant clemency, he cannot now be precluded from becoming a personal representative by the legislative prohibition contained in sections 733.302 and 733.303, Florida Statutes. [1] For the reasons discussed below, while we agree that these statutes may not constitutionally provide an absolute disqualification of a convicted felon who has had his or her civil rights restored, on remand, under Sandlin v. Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission, 531 So.2d 1344 (Fla.1988), the trial | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Moore v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1980The Gilbert rule was also applied in Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220 , 98 S.Ct. 458 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), to an uncounseled preliminary hearing. 1980The Gilbert rule was also applied in Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 220 , 98 S.Ct. 458 , 54 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), to an uncounseled preliminary hearing. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.