Griffith rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

Griffith rule in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Smith v. Stategreen
fla · 1992 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2008
2 sentences

2008Moreover, all of the United States Supreme Court decisions applying or announcing rules of criminal law must be "applied retroactively to all cases, State or Federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a `clear break' with the past. " Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987) (emphasis added); see also Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992) (applying the Griffith rule to decisions of the Florida Supreme Court).

2008Moreover, all of the United States Supreme Court decisions applying or announcing rules of criminal law must be "applied retroactively to all cases, State or Federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a `clear break' with the past. " Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987) (emphasis added); see also Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992) (applying the Griffith rule to decisions of the Florida Supreme Court).

22
Rodriguez v. Stategreen
fla · 1992 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006In Florida, it is well-settled that "[t]o be preserved for appeal, `the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that will not be heard on appeal.'" Spann v. State, 857 So.2d 845, 852 (Fla.2003) (quoting Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992)).

11
Williams v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006See Williams v. State, 773 S.W.2d 525 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (en banc); see also Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992) (adopting Griffith rule for decisions made by the Florida Supreme Court provided defendant timely objected at trial if an objection was required to preserve issue for appellate review).

11
Spann v. Stategreen
fla · 2003 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006In Florida, it is well-settled that "[t]o be preserved for appeal, `the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that will not be heard on appeal.'" Spann v. State, 857 So.2d 845, 852 (Fla.2003) (quoting Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992)).

11
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1963 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986"The exclusionary prohibition extends as well to the indirect as the direct products of such invasions." Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 416 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 453 (1963) (quoting Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920)). [3] In Ceccolini the Supreme Court emphasized that the willingness of the witness to testify was one factor to examine in determining whether the taint of unlawful police conduct had been dissipated.

1986"The exclusionary prohibition extends as well to the indirect as the direct products of such invasions." Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 416 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 453 (1963) (quoting Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920)). [3] In Ceccolini the Supreme Court emphasized that the willingness of the witness to testify was one factor to examine in determining whether the taint of unlawful police conduct had been dissipated.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Griffith v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

2008Moreover, all of the United States Supreme Court decisions applying or announcing rules of criminal law must be "applied retroactively to all cases, State or Federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a `clear break' with the past. " Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987) (emphasis added); see also Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992) (applying the Griffith rule to decisions of the Florida Supreme Court).

2008Moreover, all of the United States Supreme Court decisions applying or announcing rules of criminal law must be "applied retroactively to all cases, State or Federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a `clear break' with the past. " Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987) (emphasis added); see also Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992) (applying the Griffith rule to decisions of the Florida Supreme Court).

12008–2008
Bundy v. State green
fla · 1985
2 sentences

1992For example, in Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894 , 107 S.Ct. 295 , 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986), the Court held that hypnotically refreshed testimony is per se inadmissible in criminal trials in this state.

1992For example, in Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894 , 107 S.Ct. 295 , 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986), the Court held that hypnotically refreshed testimony is per se inadmissible in criminal trials in this state.

11992–1992
Bundy v. Florida green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

1992For example, in Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894 , 107 S.Ct. 295 , 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986), the Court held that hypnotically refreshed testimony is per se inadmissible in criminal trials in this state.

1992For example, in Bundy v. State, 471 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894 , 107 S.Ct. 295 , 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986), the Court held that hypnotically refreshed testimony is per se inadmissible in criminal trials in this state.

11992–1992
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States red
scotus · 1920
2 sentences

1986"The exclusionary prohibition extends as well to the indirect as the direct products of such invasions." Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 416 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 453 (1963) (quoting Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920)). [3] In Ceccolini the Supreme Court emphasized that the willingness of the witness to testify was one factor to examine in determining whether the taint of unlawful police conduct had been dissipated.

1986"The exclusionary prohibition extends as well to the indirect as the direct products of such invasions." Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 416 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441, 453 (1963) (quoting Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920)). [3] In Ceccolini the Supreme Court emphasized that the willingness of the witness to testify was one factor to examine in determining whether the taint of unlawful police conduct had been dissipated.

11986–1986
Guthartz v. Lewis green
fladistctapp · 1981
2 sentences

1982The Tenants failed to allege an independent tort in their pleadings and the district court's conclusion *224 that "the tenants failed to allege or prove a tort committed by Guthartz which was distinguishable from or independent of his breach of contract," 408 So.2d at 602 , is competently supported by the record.

1982The Tenants failed to allege an independent tort in their pleadings and the district court's conclusion *224 that "the tenants failed to allege or prove a tort committed by Guthartz which was distinguishable from or independent of his breach of contract," 408 So.2d at 602 , is competently supported by the record.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

PA 11 (1970–2025) TX 7 (1988–2015) FL 5 (1982–2008) ID 5 (1991–2020) WI 4 (1993–2021) OH 3 (2008–2019) TN 3 (2005–2018) IN 3 (2014–2019) NJ 3 (1987–1997) MA 2 (1990–2005) DC 2 (1992–2001) CT 2 (2002–2021) GA 2 (2010–2022) MI 2 (2010–2013) IL 2 (1990–1994) KS 2 (1993–1995) AL 2 (1991–2002) AK 2 (2006–2012) CA 2 (1989–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check