Hines motion (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

Hines motion in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Hines v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010See Hines v. State, 32 So.3d 678 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

11
Bedford v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009See Bedford v. State, 880 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State v. MacKey green
fla · 1998
2 sentences

2002Subsequently, in State v. Mackey, 719 So.2d 284 (Fla.1998), we appear lo have approved the Hines analysis.

2002Subsequently, in State v. Mackey, 719 So.2d 284 (Fla.1998), we appear lo have approved the Hines analysis.

12002–2002
Foreman v. State green
fladistctapp · 1981
1 sentence

2000Foreman v. State, 400 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

12000–2000
Jordan v. State green
fladistctapp · 1995
1 sentence

1999Jordan v. State, 664 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (no factual basis existed, pursuant to "plain feel" doctrine, to approve officer's seizure of crack cocaine from inside defendant's pocket during consensual pat-down, where officer never testified that he had seen crack cocaine prior to seizing it from defendant, that he could detect crack cocaine based upon his tactile experience, or that he had training or personal experience or had made any prior arrests involving crack cocaine).

11999–1999

Where else courts name it

IL 6 (1997–2026) FL 5 (1999–2010) GA 4 (2011–2023) TX 4 (2010–2026) DC 4 (1980–1995) MI 3 (1986–2025) NY 3 (2014–2021) MA 3 (1972–2023) OH 3 (2005–2023) PA 2 (2019–2021) IN 2 (2006–2007) CA 2 (2016–2024) WA 2 (2005–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check