5 Florida opinions name it 4 courts 1933–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLeangreen1 sentence2000See, e.g., Federal Compress & Warehouse Co., 291 U.S. at 21-22, 54 S.Ct. 267 (upholding state license taxes based on the number of cotton bales compressed per annum even though the cotton was baled at the taxpayer’s warehouse which had been designated an interstate rail carrier's depot, on grounds that "it [was] not within the power of the parties, by the descriptive terms of their contract, to convert a local business into an interstate commerce business protected by the interstate commerce clause”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed Pilots
green
1 sentence1984Moreover, in light of our reading of the prevailing authorities interpreting the interstate commerce clause, Pike v. Bruce Church, 397 U.S. 137 (1970); Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 (1945); and, Cooley v. Board of Warden, 53 U.S. 299 (1951), we find 812.051 and 21-29 to be not violative of the commerce clause. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Southern Pac. Co. v. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan, Attorney General of Arizona
green
1 sentence1984Moreover, in light of our reading of the prevailing authorities interpreting the interstate commerce clause, Pike v. Bruce Church, 397 U.S. 137 (1970); Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 (1945); and, Cooley v. Board of Warden, 53 U.S. 299 (1951), we find 812.051 and 21-29 to be not violative of the commerce clause. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
green
1 sentence1984Moreover, in light of our reading of the prevailing authorities interpreting the interstate commerce clause, Pike v. Bruce Church, 397 U.S. 137 (1970); Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 (1945); and, Cooley v. Board of Warden, 53 U.S. 299 (1951), we find 812.051 and 21-29 to be not violative of the commerce clause. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Olan Mills, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1963Commonwealth of Virginia v. Olan Mills, Inc. (Sup. Ct. of App. of Va. 1955), 196 Va. 898 , 86 S.E.2d 27, 31 . 1963Commonwealth of Virginia v. Olan Mills, Inc. (Sup. Ct. of App. of Va. 1955), 196 Va. 898 , 86 S.E.2d 27, 31 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Natchez & Southern R. R. v. Crawford
green
2 sentences1942Jur. 512 , p. 197 et seq.; 16 C.J.S. p. 1111. 99 Miss. 697 , 55 So. 596 . 1942Jur. 512 , p. 197 et seq.; 16 C.J.S. p. 1111. 99 Miss. 697 , 55 So. 596 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Buck v. Beach
green
1 sentence1933In Buck, Trustee, v. Beach, 206 U.S. 392 , 51 Law Ed. 1106, the Supreme Court of the United States said: "Generally, property, in order to be subject to taxation, must be within the jurisdiction of the power assuming to *Page 631 tax. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.