Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Knox v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003); Knox v. State, 873 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA), dism'd, 884 So.2d 22 (Fla.2004). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McBridegreen1 sentence2005See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003); Knox v. State, 873 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA), dism'd, 884 So.2d 22 (Fla.2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Melbourne v. State
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 763 (citing Johans, 613 So.2d at 1321 ). 2000In Melbourne the statement beginning the process was: "I would raise a Baxter [sic- Batson? ] Johans challenge, J-O-H-A-N-S. He's a black man...." The court commented regarding this assertion that: "Giving these words their plain meaning, defense counsel seemed to be voicing a general objection on racial grounds to the State's strike." 679 So.2d at 765 . | 3 | 2000–2008 |
State v. Johans
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 763 (citing Johans, 613 So.2d at 1321 ). 2008Id. at 763 (citing Johans, 613 So.2d at 1321 ). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Cruz v. State
green
2 sentences1995This fact-based support was sufficient to meet the threshold Johans test for invoking a proper Neil inquiry." Id. 1995This fact-based support was sufficient to meet the threshold Johans test for invoking a proper Neil inquiry." Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |