Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
FLORIDA PENINSULA INSURANCE COMPANY v. RAFAEL NOLASCO AND CELIA NOLASCOgreen1 sentence2025See Fla. Peninsula, 318 So. 3d at 588 (“[D]erogatory comments specifically attacking the integrity of opposing counsel constitute fundamental error, depriving the plaintiffs of a fair trial.” (quoting Owens Corning, 653 So. 2d at 411 )). | 1 | 1 |
Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Morsegreen1 sentence2025See Fla. Peninsula, 318 So. 3d at 588 (“[D]erogatory comments specifically attacking the integrity of opposing counsel constitute fundamental error, depriving the plaintiffs of a fair trial.” (quoting Owens Corning, 653 So. 2d at 411 )). | 1 | 1 |
Richards v. Stategreen1 sentence2014As in Rios , the instruction’s reference to the defendant’s “duty to retreat” was “not necessary because Defendant did not have a duty to retreat under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law,” and it “effectively eliminated Defendant’s sole affirmative defense.” 143 So.3d at 1170; see also Richards v. State, 39 So.3d 431, 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (finding that jury instructions referencing a “duty to retreat” rose “to the level of fundamental error” where the defendant’s “sole defense at trial was that he acted in self-defense” thereby entitling him to a Stand Your Ground defense). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See id.; Carter v. State, 469 So.2d 194, 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Williams v. State, 982 So.2d 1190, 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See id.; Carter v. State, 469 So.2d 194, 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Williams v. State, 982 So.2d 1190, 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Johnson v. State, 833 So.2d 252, 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rich v. State
green
1 sentence2004E.g., Zuniga, 869 So.2d at 1239 ; Rich v. State, 858 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Zuniga v. State
green
1 sentence2004E.g., Zuniga, 869 So.2d at 1239 ; Rich v. State, 858 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.