Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
SC19-1356 Ken Eldon Lott v. State of Floridagreen2 sentences2026See Lott v. State, 303 So. 3d 165 , 166 (Fla. 2020). 12. 2026See Lott v. State, 303 So. 3d 165 , 166 (Fla. 2020). 12. | 1 | 1 |
Spann v. Stategreen2 sentences2015As an initial matter, we reject Eag-lin’s argument pertaining to the adequacy, of the Koon inquiry itself because this claim should have been raised on direct appeal: See Spann v. State, 857 So.2d 845, 853-54 (Fla.2003). 2015As an initial matter, we reject Eag-lin’s argument pertaining to the adequacy, of the Koon inquiry itself because this claim should have been raised on direct appeal: See Spann v. State, 857 So.2d 845, 853-54 (Fla.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Stategreen2 sentences2011“Mitigating evidence must be considered and weighed when contained ‘anywhere in the record, to the extent it is believable and uncontroverted,’ ” LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Fla.2001) (quoting Robinson v. State, 684 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla.1996)). 2011“Mitigating evidence must be considered and weighed when contained ‘anywhere in the record, to the extent it is believable and uncontroverted,’ ” LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Fla.2001) (quoting Robinson v. State, 684 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
LaMarca v. Stategreen2 sentences2011“Mitigating evidence must be considered and weighed when contained ‘anywhere in the record, to the extent it is believable and uncontroverted,’ ” LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Fla.2001) (quoting Robinson v. State, 684 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla.1996)). 2011“Mitigating evidence must be considered and weighed when contained ‘anywhere in the record, to the extent it is believable and uncontroverted,’ ” LaMarca v. State, 785 So.2d 1209, 1215 (Fla.2001) (quoting Robinson v. State, 684 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grim v. State
green
2 sentences2017Grim, 841 So.2d at 461 . 2017Grim, 841 So.2d at 461 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Spencer v. State
green
1 sentence2003NOTES [1] Deputy McCauley testified that it was blood. [2] This hearing was a continuation of the Koon hearing conducted before the jury was chosen. [3] See Spencer v. State, 615 So.2d 688 (Fla. 1993). [4] Even though the trial judge in the present case was not required to comply with the procedures enunciated in Muhammad due to the fact that Grim's trial was completed before the Muhammad case was decided, we commend the trial judge for his insight in handling Grim's waiver of mitigation. [5] Even though special counsel was not appointed to present mitigation during the penalty phase, the tria | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Koon v. Dugger
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.