Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Savoie v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Savoie v. State, 422 So. 2d 308, 310 (Fla. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See Lowe v. State , 2 So.3d 21 , 28 n.1 (Fla. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Rodriguez v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Rodriguez v. State, 919 So. 2d 1252, 1287 (Fla. 2005) (“Rodriguez has not sufficiently pled this claim as he has not explained what issues he was unable to raise as a result of any missing or inaccurate record. 2018See Rodriguez v. State , 919 So.2d 1252 , 1287 (Fla. 2005) ("Rodriguez has not sufficiently pled this claim as he has not explained what issues he was unable to raise as a result of any missing or inaccurate record. | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Moore v. State, 820 So.2d 199 (Fla.2002) (holding that because defendant’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct was raised on direct appeal and was found to have no merit, the claim under the guise of ineffective assistance of counsel was procedurally barred); see also Hardwick v. Dugger, 648 *38 So.2d 100 (Fla.1994) (issues that were raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred and cannot be raised in a postcon-viction motion). | 1 | 1 |
Bedford v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See Bedford v. State, 880 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (explaining circumstances under which defendant may receive jail credit for time *933 spent in the jail of a county other than the county where the defendant was sentenced). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. State
green
2 sentences2018Lowe asserted that: (1) the trial court erred in denying Lowe’s motion to suppress his confession; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear certain portions of Lowe’s taped interrogation; (3) the trial court erred in admitting a box of Lowe’s personal items; (4) he was denied his constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and the equal protection of the law when the trial court declined to appoint two attorneys for his defense; (5) the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing under Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); (6) the trial court err 2018Lowe asserted that: (1) the trial court erred in denying Lowe's motion to suppress his confession; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear certain portions of Lowe's taped interrogation; (3) the trial court erred in admitting a box of Lowe's personal items; (4) he was denied his constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and the equal protection of the law when the trial court declined to appoint two attorneys for his defense; (5) the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing under Nelson v. State , 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) ; (6) the trial court er | 2 | 2008–2018 |
Thompson v. State
green
1 sentence2018Lowe asserted that: (1) the trial court erred in denying Lowe’s motion to suppress his confession; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear certain portions of Lowe’s taped interrogation; (3) the trial court erred in admitting a box of Lowe’s personal items; (4) he was denied his constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and the equal protection of the law when the trial court declined to appoint two attorneys for his defense; (5) the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing under Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); (6) the trial court err | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Huff v. State
green
1 sentence2008Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). 3 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Sherrod v. Franza
green
1 sentence1983But for the reasons stated in my dissent in Sherrod v. Franza, 427 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1983), I dissent from the holding that the district court erred in concluding that prohibition is inappropriate to remedy a speedy trial rule violation. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.