Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shimko v. Stategreen2 sentences2015This Court recently held that “[i]t is impermissible for the state to insinuate impeaching facts while questioning a defense witness without evidence to back up those facts.” Braddy v. State, 111 So.3d 810, 853 (Fla.2012) (quoting Shimko. v. State, 883 So.2d 341, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)). 2015This Court recently held that “[i]t is impermissible for the state to insinuate impeaching facts while questioning a defense witness without evidence to back up those facts.” Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810, 853 (Fla. 2012) (quoting Shimko v. State, 883 So. 2d 341, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)). | 2 | 2 |
Braddy v. Stategreen2 sentences2015This Court recently held that “[i]t is impermissible for the state to insinuate impeaching facts while questioning a defense witness without evidence to back up those facts.” Braddy v. State, 111 So.3d 810, 853 (Fla.2012) (quoting Shimko. v. State, 883 So.2d 341, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)). 2015This Court recently held that “[i]t is impermissible for the state to insinuate impeaching facts while questioning a defense witness without evidence to back up those facts.” Braddy v. State, 111 So. 3d 810, 853 (Fla. 2012) (quoting Shimko v. State, 883 So. 2d 341, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kloster Cruise Ltd. v. Grubbs
green
1 sentence2016Tell them by the verdict that it is significant.’” Even though counsel did not specifically use the phrase “send a message,” the Third District nonetheless categorized the statements as “send a message” arguments, and held that the trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial was error because the comments were “clearly improper.” Id. at 555 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2004Rather, Smith's claim is that the denial conflicted with this Court's prior cases that recognize prejudicial error in the admission of testimony of "the kind forbidden by the Williams rule [4] and section 90.404(2)." Jackson, 451 So.2d at 461 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Barrett v. State
green
1 sentence1991Id. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.