Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Valdes v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Compare with Valdes v. State, 3 So. 3d 1067, 1077-78 (Fla. 2009) (finding dual convictions of discharging a firearm from a vehicle in violation of section 790.15(2) and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19 did not satisfy the second exception because the two offenses are found in separate statutory provisions, and observing: “This is in contrast to sections 790.15(1), 790.15(2), and 790.15(3), which are explicitly degree variants of the same offense.”) (footnotes omitted); Velazco v. State, 342 So. 3d 614 , 616 (Fla. 2022) (holding that dual convictions of DUI and D 2011Valdes, 3 So.3d at 1068 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robert Velazco v. State of Florida
green
1 sentence2024Compare with Valdes v. State, 3 So. 3d 1067, 1077-78 (Fla. 2009) (finding dual convictions of discharging a firearm from a vehicle in violation of section 790.15(2) and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19 did not satisfy the second exception because the two offenses are found in separate statutory provisions, and observing: “This is in contrast to sections 790.15(1), 790.15(2), and 790.15(3), which are explicitly degree variants of the same offense.”) (footnotes omitted); Velazco v. State, 342 So. 3d 614 , 616 (Fla. 2022) (holding that dual convictions of DUI and D | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Jones v. Singletary
neutral
1 sentence2019Jones v. Singletary, 621 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Valdes v. State
green
1 sentence2009The Third District Court of Appeal in Valdes v. State, 970 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), concluded that no double jeopardy violation occurred from the dual convictions and certified conflict with Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), which reached the opposite conclusion. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Lopez-Vazquez v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 235 . 2009The Third District Court of Appeal in Valdes v. State, 970 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), concluded that no double jeopardy violation occurred from the dual convictions and certified conflict with Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), which reached the opposite conclusion. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Horn v. State
green
1 sentence2006Before Bradford , the first district held in Horn v. State, 677 So.2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), that the use of a firearm wás a necessary element of shooting at an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (1993). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.