Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.green2 sentences2025Co., 921 So. 2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006) (“Service of process . . . notif[ies] a party of a legal claim and . . . enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”); Aills v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1108 (Fla. 2010) (“fail[ing] to advance the specific ground of objection relied upon by the district court for reversal . . . was not preserved for appellate review.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so 2023Co., 921 So. 2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006) (“Service of process is the means of notifying a party of a legal claim and, when accomplished, enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”) (emphasis added); Brown v. BNB Inv. | 5 | 5 |
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahasseegreen1 sentence2025Co., 921 So. 2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006) (“Service of process . . . notif[ies] a party of a legal claim and . . . enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”); Aills v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1108 (Fla. 2010) (“fail[ing] to advance the specific ground of objection relied upon by the district court for reversal . . . was not preserved for appellate review.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so | 1 | 1 |
Proctor v. Schomberggreen1 sentence2025Co., 921 So. 2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006) (“Service of process . . . notif[ies] a party of a legal claim and . . . enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”); Aills v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1108 (Fla. 2010) (“fail[ing] to advance the specific ground of objection relied upon by the district court for reversal . . . was not preserved for appellate review.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so | 1 | 1 |
Aills v. Boemigreen1 sentence2025Co., 921 So. 2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006) (“Service of process . . . notif[ies] a party of a legal claim and . . . enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”); Aills v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1108 (Fla. 2010) (“fail[ing] to advance the specific ground of objection relied upon by the district court for reversal . . . was not preserved for appellate review.”); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Bnb Investment Holdingsgreen1 sentence2023Holdings, LLC, 252 So. 3d 344, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“[W]hen the trial court ruled that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Brown and granted Brown’s motion to dismiss, the trial court effectively voided the service of process and therefore could not simultaneously order Brown to respond to BNB's Second Amended Complaint within fifteen days after its filing without requiring BNB to re-serve Brown.”). | 1 | 1 |
Abbate v. Provident Nat. Bankgreen1 sentence2014Co., 921 So.2d 587, 591 (Fla.2006) (“Service of process is the means of notifying a party of a legal claim and, when accomplished, enables the court to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant and proceed to judgment.”); Abbate v. Provident Nat’l Bank, 631 So.2d 312, 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (“Jurisdiction is perfected by the proper service of sufficient process.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.