precise formulation warning (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

precise formulation warning in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Lamia v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1970 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See, e.g., United States v. Lamia, 429 F.2d 373, 375-376 (CA2), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 907 , 91 S.Ct. 150 , 27 L.Ed.2d 146 (1970).

1983See, e.g., United States v. Lamia, 429 F.2d 373, 375-376 (CA2), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 907 , 91 S.Ct. 150 , 27 L.Ed.2d 146 (1970).

11
United States v. Robert Anthony Lamiagreen
ca2 · 1970 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983See, e.g., United States v. Lamia, 429 F.2d 373, 375-376 (CA2), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 907 , 91 S.Ct. 150 , 27 L.Ed.2d 146 (1970).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
California v. Prysock green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

2007In rejecting the view that Miranda requires a “talismanic incantation,” the Supreme Court in Prysoclc observed: “This Court has never indicated that the ‘rigidity’ of Miranda extends to the precise formulation of the warnings given a criminal defendant.” 453 U.S. at 359 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 .

2007In rejecting the view that Miranda requires a “talismanic incantation,” the Supreme Court in Prysoclc observed: “This Court has never indicated that the ‘rigidity’ of Miranda extends to the precise formulation of the warnings given a criminal defendant.” 453 U.S. at 359 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 .

51983–2007
Roberts v. State green
fladistctapp · 2004
1 sentence

2006Roberts, 874 So.2d at 1227 .

12006–2006

Where else courts name it

AL 6 (1989–1993) CA 6 (1993–2024) KY 5 (2009–2024) FL 5 (1983–2007) NM 3 (2018–2024) SD 3 (1982–1990) TX 3 (1985–2007) VA 2 (2008–2018) WA 2 (2015–2015) MA 2 (1998–2005) NC 2 (2013–2025) ME 2 (2016–2016) IL 2 (1990–2015) OH 2 (2004–2008) UT 2 (1989–2018) NY 2 (1993–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check