Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ventura v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Carlisle v. State, 164 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also Mack v. State, 58 So.3d 354, 355-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Ash v. State, 995 So.2d 1158, 1158-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); accord Ventura, 29 So.3d at 1089 (“[A]ny comment — direct or indirect — by anyone at trial on this right is constitutional error that should be avoided.”). 2013As we have explained, “commenting on the silence of an accused is not a viable strategy for obtaining convictions, and any comment — direct or indirect — by anyone at trial on this right is constitutional error that should be avoided.” Ventura v. State, 29 So.3d 1086, 1088-89 (Fla.2010) (original emphasis). | 2 | 3 |
State v. DiGuiliogreen2 sentences2012See DiGuilio, 491 So.2d at 1136, 1139 . 2010See DiGuilio, 491 So.2d at 1136, 1139 . | 2 | 2 |
Mack v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Carlisle v. State, 164 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also Mack v. State, 58 So.3d 354, 355-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Ash v. State, 995 So.2d 1158, 1158-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); accord Ventura, 29 So.3d at 1089 (“[A]ny comment — direct or indirect — by anyone at trial on this right is constitutional error that should be avoided.”). | 1 | 1 |
Ash v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Carlisle v. State, 164 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also Mack v. State, 58 So.3d 354, 355-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Ash v. State, 995 So.2d 1158, 1158-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); accord Ventura, 29 So.3d at 1089 (“[A]ny comment — direct or indirect — by anyone at trial on this right is constitutional error that should be avoided.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carlisle v. State
green
1 sentence2015Carlisle v. State, 164 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); see also Mack v. State, 58 So.3d 354, 355-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Ash v. State, 995 So.2d 1158, 1158-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); accord Ventura, 29 So.3d at 1089 (“[A]ny comment — direct or indirect — by anyone at trial on this right is constitutional error that should be avoided.”). | 1 | 2015–2015 |