Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1967–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Huie v. Stategreen1 sentence1982Accord Huie v. State, 92 So.2d 264, 269 (Fla. 1957). | 1 | 1 |
Kauffman v. Kinggreen1 sentence1982A succinct analysis of the purpose and function of the writ is stated in Kauffman v. King, 89 So.2d 24, 26 (Fla. 1956): It is only in exceptional cases, such as those where the lower court acts without or in excess of jurisdiction, or where the interlocutory order does not conform to the essential requirements of law and may reasonably cause material injury throughout the subsequent proceedings for which the remedy by appeal will be inadequate, that this court will exercise its discretionary power to issue the writ. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
TB v. State
green
2 sentences1991In T.B. v. State, 306 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), the Second District offered a succinct analysis of the prevailing law: A confession is not involuntary merely because the person making it is a juvenile. 1991In T.B. v. State, 306 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), the Second District offered a succinct analysis of the prevailing law: A confession is not involuntary merely because the person making it is a juvenile. | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Herring v. New York
green
2 sentences1980In Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 857 , 95 S.Ct. 2550, 2553 , 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975), Mr. Justice Stewart offered this succinct analysis: [T]he right to the assistance of counsel has been understood to mean that there can be no restrictions upon the function of counsel in defending a criminal prosecution in accord with the traditions of the adversary factfinding process that has been constitutionalized in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. 1980In Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 857 , 95 S.Ct. 2550, 2553 , 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975), Mr. Justice Stewart offered this succinct analysis: [T]he right to the assistance of counsel has been understood to mean that there can be no restrictions upon the function of counsel in defending a criminal prosecution in accord with the traditions of the adversary factfinding process that has been constitutionalized in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Rood Company v. BD. OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE CTY.
green
1 sentence1967A succinct analysis of the question of waiver was set forth by Justice O’Connell in Rood Company v. Board of Public Instruction, Fla.1958, 102 So.2d 139 . | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.