5 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1968–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richard Winkler v. John Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facilitygreen2 sentences2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the 2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Angel A. Soldevila-Lopez, A/K/A \Angelogreen2 sentences2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the 2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the | 1 | 1 |
Mark Dean Schwab v. James v. Crosby, Jr.green2 sentences2007See, e.g., Schwab v. Crosby, 451 F.3d 1308, 1324-28 (11th Cir. 2006). 2007See, e.g., Schwab v. Crosby, 451 F.3d 1308, 1324-28 (11th Cir. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Divisiongreen2 sentences2007Id. (quoting Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258, 1266 (5th Cir.1995) (en banc)). 2007Id. (quoting Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258, 1266 (5th Cir.1995) (en banc)). | 1 | 1 |
Sliney v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). 2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Gambino, Rosariogreen2 sentences2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the 2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the | 1 | 1 |
Richard Adams Hovey v. Robert L. Ayers, Jr., Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentingreen2 sentences2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the 2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). 2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). | 1 | 1 |
Mungin v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). 2007See Sliney v. State, 944 So.2d 270, 279 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Mungin v. State, 932 So.2d 986, 1001 (Fla.2006) (successive representation); Brown v. State, 894 So.2d 137, 157 (Fla.2004) (financial conflict). | 1 | 1 |
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'ngreen1 sentence2006See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. SEARS AUTH. TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL, INC.green1 sentence2002See Sullivan, 780 So.2d at 997 . | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. Stategreen1 sentence1983Sullivan v. State, 372 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla. 1979). | 1 | 1 |
Abram v. Odhamgreen2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1 |
Abram v. Odhamgreen2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Joe Harry Pegg v. United States
green
2 sentences2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the 2007Additionally, our research has revealed that although the two-part viable alternative test appears to be used in the federal First, Second, Third and Ninth Circuits, See, e.g., Hovey v. Ayers, 458 F.3d 892, 908 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Soldevila-Lopez, 17 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir.1994); Winkler v. Keane, 7 F.3d 304, 309 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. Gambino, 864 F.2d 1064, 1070 (3d Cir.1988), it has been rejected by the Fourth, Eighth and Eleventh circuits courts in favor of a three-part test that expressly requires a defendant to demonstrate "a link between the actual conflict and the | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Mickens v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2007In Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 174 , 122 S.Ct. 1237 , 152 L.Ed.2d 291 (2002), the Supreme Court stated in dictum that since Sullivan , the federal circuit courts had "unblinkingly" applied the Sullivan exception to "all kinds of alleged attorney ethical conflicts" beyond the multiple representation scenario in Sullivan. 2007In Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 174 , 122 S.Ct. 1237 , 152 L.Ed.2d 291 (2002), the Supreme Court stated in dictum that since Sullivan , the federal circuit courts had "unblinkingly" applied the Sullivan exception to "all kinds of alleged attorney ethical conflicts" beyond the multiple representation scenario in Sullivan. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McCrae v. State
green
1 sentence1983Most recently in McCrae v. State, 437 So.2d 1388 (Fla. 1983), we reiterated that matters that were raised on appeal of a conviction and sentence and decided adversely to the movant and matters which could have been presented on that appeal are not cognizable under a Rule 3.850 motion. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Murray v. Holiday On Ice Shows, Inc.
green
2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Matte ex rel. Matte v. Griffis
neutral
2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Amos v. Florida Publishing Co.
neutral
2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Co.
neutral
2 sentences1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . 1968See Abram v. Odham and Florida Publishing Company, 6 Fla. Supp. 102 , affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court (1956) at 89 So.2d 334 ; Amos v. Florida Publishing Company (1964) 23 Fla. Supp. 169 ; Barrow v. Florida Publishing Company (1965), affirmed per curiam by Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, at 178 So.2d 628 , certiorari dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court at 183 So. 2d 215 ; Carroll v. Florida Publishing Company (1965) 25 Fla. Supp. 5 ; and Sullivan v. Florida Publishing Company (1966) 26 Fla. Supp. 51 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
West v. Florida Publishing Co.
neutral
2 sentences1968When plaintiff’s original complaint was before the court, the court in its order of December 20, 1967, reported at 29 Fla. Supp. 192 , followed the above authorities and held — “These authorities, together with the others which have been considered seem to say that where it is apparent from the papers filed with the complaint or from the language of the complaint itself that the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, it then becomes his duty to allege facts sufficient to comply with the language quoted from the Associated Press case. 1968When plaintiff’s original complaint was before the court, the court in its order of December 20, 1967, reported at 29 Fla. Supp. 192 , followed the above authorities and held — “These authorities, together with the others which have been considered seem to say that where it is apparent from the papers filed with the complaint or from the language of the complaint itself that the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure, it then becomes his duty to allege facts sufficient to comply with the language quoted from the Associated Press case. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.