Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Howard v. State, 883 So.2d 879, 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). | 1 | 1 |
Bernier v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., Bernier v. State, 951 So.2d 21, 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (upholding revocation of probation order where record made it clear that the court would have revoked probation solely on the basis of a violation of a single condition of probation). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Since the transcript of the revocation hearing reveals the possible existence of an amended affidavit charging the substantive violation, and finding no error in the trial court's determination that Baker violated the substantive condition, rather than requiring Baker's discharge, we remand with instructions for the trial court to conduct further proceedings to determine the existence of the amended affidavit and to, essentially, "reconstruct the record." See, e.g., Harris v. State, 525 So.2d at 450, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tuff v. State
green
2 sentences1980Therefore, this case does not require a remand as in Tuff v. State, 338 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). 1979Cf. Tuff v. State, 338 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). | 2 | 1979–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.