Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herring v. Duggergreen1 sentence2000Id. at 576 , 107 S.Ct. 851 ; see Herring v. Dugger, 528 So.2d 1176, 1178 (Fla.1988) (stating that “a warning and waiver of rights given following the arrest for a criminal offense is sufficient to cover any later statements to a law enforcement officer concerning other criminal offenses”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Colorado v. Spring
green
2 sentences2000Id. at 576 , 107 S.Ct. 851 ; see Herring v. Dugger, 528 So.2d 1176, 1178 (Fla.1988) (stating that “a warning and waiver of rights given following the arrest for a criminal offense is sufficient to cover any later statements to a law enforcement officer concerning other criminal offenses”). 2000Id. at 576 , 107 S.Ct. 851 ; see Herring v. Dugger, 528 So.2d 1176, 1178 (Fla.1988) (stating that “a warning and waiver of rights given following the arrest for a criminal offense is sufficient to cover any later statements to a law enforcement officer concerning other criminal offenses”). | 2 | 1988–2000 |
Hernandez v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Missouri v. Seibert
green
2 sentences2010However, the United States Supreme Court has acknowledged that there are eases in which a defendant can argue “a self-incriminating statement was ‘compelled’ despite the fact that the law enforcement authorities adhered to the dictates of Miranda.” Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 609 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004) (plurality opinion) (quoting Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 , 433 n. 20, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)). 2010However, the United States Supreme Court has acknowledged that there are eases in which a defendant can argue “a self-incriminating statement was ‘compelled’ despite the fact that the law enforcement authorities adhered to the dictates of Miranda.” Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 609 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004) (plurality opinion) (quoting Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 , 433 n. 20, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Berkemer v. McCarty
green
2 sentences2010However, the United States Supreme Court has acknowledged that there are eases in which a defendant can argue “a self-incriminating statement was ‘compelled’ despite the fact that the law enforcement authorities adhered to the dictates of Miranda.” Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 609 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004) (plurality opinion) (quoting Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 , 433 n. 20, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)). 2010However, the United States Supreme Court has acknowledged that there are eases in which a defendant can argue “a self-incriminating statement was ‘compelled’ despite the fact that the law enforcement authorities adhered to the dictates of Miranda.” Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 609 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004) (plurality opinion) (quoting Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 , 433 n. 20, 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 (1984)). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Rajaee
green
1 sentence2000In Rajaee , the court emphasized that while "the rule does not require the judge to inquire as to whether the defendant is a citizen ...," by giving the warning required by the rule (which was done in Rajaee , ) the trial court taking a plea places the defendant "on notice that he should know, or if any doubt exists he should determine, his citizenship status before proceeding with the plea." Id. at 470 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.