Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perkins v. Kranzgreen2 sentences2013This issue is a question of law.4 3 None of the appellants enumerate as error the grant of summary judgment on their claims for breach of warranty. 4 (Footnote omitted.) Perkins v. Kranz, 316 Ga. App. 171, 172 (1) ( 728 SE2d 804 ) (2012). 6 Under Georgia law, an automobile retailer generally has no duty to disclose a latent product defect of which it had no knowledge5 or to test vehicles it purchases for resale for the purpose of discovering latent or concealed defects.6 However, where the retailer makes such an inspection, it incurs a duty to conduct such inspection non- negligently.7 In the 2013This issue is a question of law.4 3 None of the appellants enumerate as error the grant of summary judgment on their claims for breach of warranty. 4 (Footnote omitted.) Perkins v. Kranz, 316 Ga. App. 171, 172 (1) ( 728 SE2d 804 ) (2012). 6 Under Georgia law, an automobile retailer generally has no duty to disclose a latent product defect of which it had no knowledge5 or to test vehicles it purchases for resale for the purpose of discovering latent or concealed defects.6 However, where the retailer makes such an inspection, it incurs a duty to conduct such inspection non- negligently.7 In the | 2 | 2 |
Nix v. Sandersgreen2 sentences1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 (231 SE2d 572);Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). 1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Houston v. Rutledge
green
2 sentences1978The appellees, on the other hand, argue that the trial court has merely balanced the interest of the public in favor of inspection against the interest of the public in favor of non-inspection, as required by Houston v. Rutledge, 237 Ga. 764 ( 229 SE2d 624 ) (1976). 1978The appellees, on the other hand, argue that the trial court has merely balanced the interest of the public in favor of inspection against the interest of the public in favor of non-inspection, as required by Houston v. Rutledge, 237 Ga. 764 ( 229 SE2d 624 ) (1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Welch
green
2 sentences1978Co. v. Welch, 120 Ga. App. 334 (3) ( 170 SE2d 703 ) (1969). (d) The appellants enumerate as error the fact that the jurors were allowed to have drink other than water, notwithstanding the bailiff’s receiving the oath prescribed by Code § 59-717. 1978Co. v. Welch, 120 Ga. App. 334 (3) ( 170 SE2d 703 ) (1969). (d) The appellants enumerate as error the fact that the jurors were allowed to have drink other than water, notwithstanding the bailiff’s receiving the oath prescribed by Code § 59-717. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Richey v. Cothran
green
2 sentences1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). 1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Kriseman v. Kenmore
green
2 sentences1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). 1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
McCann v. Duggan
green
2 sentences1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). 1978See Nix v. Sanders, 136 Ga. App. 859 ( 223 SE2d 21 ); Richey v. Cothran, 140 Ga. App. 580 ( 231 SE2d 572 ); Kriseman v. Kenmore, 143 Ga. App. 490 ( 238 SE2d 585 ); McCann v. Duggan, 144 Ga. App. 547 ( 241 SE2d 647 ). | 1 | 1978–1978 |