case fall within exception (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

case fall within exception in Georgia

5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1922–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Thomas v. Dicksongreen
ga · 1983 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988The facts of this case fall within the exception recognized in Thomas v. Dickson, 250 Ga. 772, 774 ( 301 SE2d 49 ) and Caswell v. Jordan, 184 Ga. App. 755 (1) ( 362 SE2d 769 ), cert. den.

1988The facts of this case fall within the exception recognized in Thomas v. Dickson, 250 Ga. 772, 774 ( 301 SE2d 49 ) and Caswell v. Jordan, 184 Ga. App. 755 (1) ( 362 SE2d 769 ), cert. den.

11
Moore v. Adamsgreen
ga · 1922 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1933–1933
2 sentences

1933Burns v. Horkan, 126 Ga. 161 ( 54 S. E. 946 ); Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 ( 113 S. E. 383 , 23 A. L.

1933Burns v. Horkan, 126 Ga. 161 ( 54 S. E. 946 ); Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 ( 113 S. E. 383 , 23 A. L.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Jackson v. Virginia red
scotus · 1979
1 sentence

1992Because the facts of this case fall within the rule of Edge, and because (as we find below) the evidence in support of the verdict of voluntary manslaughter meets the test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), we reverse appellant’s conviction for felony murder and remand this case to the superior court, where appellant will be resentenced for voluntary manslaughter in place of felony murder. 2.

11992–1992
Caswell v. Jordan green
gactapp · 1987
2 sentences

1988The facts of this case fall within the exception recognized in Thomas v. Dickson, 250 Ga. 772, 774 ( 301 SE2d 49 ) and Caswell v. Jordan, 184 Ga. App. 755 (1) ( 362 SE2d 769 ), cert. den.

1988The facts of this case fall within the exception recognized in Thomas v. Dickson, 250 Ga. 772, 774 ( 301 SE2d 49 ) and Caswell v. Jordan, 184 Ga. App. 755 (1) ( 362 SE2d 769 ), cert. den.

11988–1988
Ratteree v. Nelson neutral
ga · 1851
1 sentence

1957Nor does this case fall within the principle of law regarding expression of opinion by a trial judge, as covered in Ratteree v. Nelson, 10 Ga. 439 (2), Smallwood v. Warfield, 49 Ga. App. 93 (1) ( 174 S. E. 185 ), and Code § 81-1104.

11957–1957
Smallwood v. Warfield green
gactapp · 1934
2 sentences

1957Nor does this case fall within the principle of law regarding expression of opinion by a trial judge, as covered in Ratteree v. Nelson, 10 Ga. 439 (2), Smallwood v. Warfield, 49 Ga. App. 93 (1) ( 174 S. E. 185 ), and Code § 81-1104.

1957Nor does this case fall within the principle of law regarding expression of opinion by a trial judge, as covered in Ratteree v. Nelson, 10 Ga. 439 (2), Smallwood v. Warfield, 49 Ga. App. 93 (1) ( 174 S. E. 185 ), and Code § 81-1104.

11957–1957
Burns v. Horkan green
ga · 1906
2 sentences

1933Burns v. Horkan, 126 Ga. 161 ( 54 S. E. 946 ); Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 ( 113 S. E. 383 , 23 A. L.

1933Burns v. Horkan, 126 Ga. 161 ( 54 S. E. 946 ); Moore v. Adams, 153 Ga. 709, 712 ( 113 S. E. 383 , 23 A. L.

11933–1933
Crawley v. Barge green
ga · 1909
2 sentences

1922Nor does this case fall within the exception to the general rule laid down in the Civil Code (19Í0), § 5527, which declares that “in cases of injunction to stay pending proceedings, . . the petition may be filed in the county where the proceedings are pending: Provided, no relief is prayed as to matters not included in such litigation.” This exception is not applicable to the case at bar, (1) because relief is prayed as to matters not included in the suit in the city court (Crawley v. Barge, 132 Ga. 96 , 63 S. E. 819 ); and (2) because the plaintiffs are not parties to the suit in the city cou

1922Nor does this case fall within the exception to the general rule laid down in the Civil Code (19Í0), § 5527, which declares that “in cases of injunction to stay pending proceedings, . . the petition may be filed in the county where the proceedings are pending: Provided, no relief is prayed as to matters not included in such litigation.” This exception is not applicable to the case at bar, (1) because relief is prayed as to matters not included in the suit in the city court (Crawley v. Barge, 132 Ga. 96 , 63 S. E. 819 ); and (2) because the plaintiffs are not parties to the suit in the city cou

11922–1922
Stone v. King-Hodgson Co. green
ga · 1913
2 sentences

1922Stone v. King-Hodgson Co., 140 Ga. 487 ( 79 S. E. 122 ).

1922Stone v. King-Hodgson Co., 140 Ga. 487 ( 79 S. E. 122 ).

11922–1922

Where else courts name it

CA 9 (1920–2016) GA 5 (1922–1992) FL 5 (1959–1989) OR 4 (2006–2015) ID 4 (1931–1999) TX 4 (1963–2015) NY 3 (1922–1995) AR 3 (1909–1922) TN 3 (1938–1989) LA 3 (1972–1981) IN 3 (1910–1987) MI 2 (2001–2020) MO 2 (1915–1948) IL 2 (1987–2013) PA 2 (1918–1938) MT 2 (1917–1978) KS 2 (1889–1979) OH 2 (1936–1981) WA 2 (1908–1915) NE 2 (1908–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check