Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ceasar v. Shelton Land Co.green2 sentences2009We conclude that “to the extent it is necessary to establish the boundaries of the cemetery and the extent of plaintiffs’ easement as between the parties, a declaratory judgment action would lie for such a purpose.” Ceasar v. The Shelton Land Co., 285 Ga. App. 421, 424 (4) ( 646 SE2d 689 ) (2007). 5. 2009We conclude that “to the extent it is necessary to establish the boundaries of the cemetery and the extent of plaintiffs’ easement as between the parties, a declaratory judgment action would lie for such a purpose.” Ceasar v. The Shelton Land Co., 285 Ga. App. 421, 424 (4) ( 646 SE2d 689 ) (2007). 5. | 1 | 1 |
Tyler v. Lincolngreen2 sentences2009See Tyler *7 v. Lincoln, 272 Ga. 118, 121 (2) ( 527 SE2d 180 ) (2000) (“statute authorizes an attorney fee award even when nominal damages are recovered”). 2009See Tyler *7 v. Lincoln, 272 Ga. 118, 121 (2) ( 527 SE2d 180 ) (2000) (“statute authorizes an attorney fee award even when nominal damages are recovered”). | 1 | 1 |
Bishop v. Farhatgreen2 sentences1998See generally Bishop v. Farhat, 227 Ga.App. 201, 206 (6), 489 S.E.2d 323 (1997) (summary judgment in favor of distributor of medical gloves used by non-purchasing nurse held improper). 1998See generally Bishop v. Farhat, 227 Ga.App. 201, 206 (6), 489 S.E.2d 323 (1997) (summary judgment in favor of distributor of medical gloves used by non-purchasing nurse held improper). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The court must give a supersedeas bond applicant “notice of the hearing and a chance to appear and be heard.” Moore v. State, 151 Ga. App. 413, 414 ( 260 SE2d 350 ). 1995The court must give a supersedeas bond applicant “notice of the hearing and a chance to appear and be heard.” Moore v. State, 151 Ga. App. 413, 414 ( 260 SE2d 350 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fears v. State
green
2 sentences1988The Farmer rule just stated was reaffirmed in Fears v. State, 169 Ga. App. 172 ( 312 SE2d 174 ). 1988The Farmer rule just stated was reaffirmed in Fears v. State, 169 Ga. App. 172 ( 312 SE2d 174 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Tanner-Brice Co. v. Barrs
green
2 sentences1984The trial court denied Farmer’s motion for a directed verdict stating “that there was a question of fact for the jury to determine on [the] issue [of probable cause], not that a crime was committed but that the person charged was guilty of the crime for which he was prosecuted.” This was an incorrect statement of the law. “ ‘In actions for malicious prosecution, the question is, not whether the plaintiff [Dillard] was guilty, but whether the defendant [Farmer] had reasonable cause to so believe — whether the circumstances were such as to create in the mind of the defendant a reasonable belief 1984The trial court denied Farmer’s motion for a directed verdict stating “that there was a question of fact for the jury to determine on [the] issue [of probable cause], not that a crime was committed but that the person charged was guilty of the crime for which he was prosecuted.” This was an incorrect statement of the law. “ ‘In actions for malicious prosecution, the question is, not whether the plaintiff [Dillard] was guilty, but whether the defendant [Farmer] had reasonable cause to so believe — whether the circumstances were such as to create in the mind of the defendant a reasonable belief | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.